MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3120386341 · doi:10.1002/ppap.202170005

Special Issue: Plasma and agriculture II

2021· article· en· W3120386341 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevuePlasma Processes and Polymers · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePlasma Applications and Diagnostics
Établissements canadiensPolytechnique Montréal
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAgricultureProduction (economics)Food processingBusinessFertilizerEmerging technologiesAgricultural productivityNatural resource economicsAgricultural economicsEngineeringBiotechnologyEnvironmental scienceAgricultural scienceNanotechnologyPolitical scienceEconomicsBiologyAgronomyMaterials scienceEcology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Low-temperature plasma (LTP) science and technology are rapidly establishing their place in agriculture, with already existing or envisaged future commercial applications in (i) sustainable fertilizer production, (ii) food safety “from farm to fork,” and (iii) in reducing pollution and pathogens. The fact that plasma is able to generate highly reactive chemical species from electricity, water, and air makes LTP technology a very attractive alternative to many conventional chemical approaches: LTP clearly has the potential to become disruptive toward the chemical industry that currently drives agricultural growth in a centralized way. On-demand local fertilizer production or pathogen inactivation at the farm by LTP technology will reduce the need for complex logistics. A vision for the future of LTP is to develop novel technologies that help reduce the environmental impact of agriculture, while at the same time meeting the increasing demand of our growing world population for a reliable supply of accessible and safe food. Topics of LTP technology in agriculture include decontamination and pollution reduction; increased plant growth and yield; safe production, distribution, and consumption of food; and fundamentals of plant biology. Research interest worldwide has reached a new high, including that from increasing numbers of industrial participants. This journal, Plasma Processes and Polymers (PPaP), has accompanied the above-described developments in “Plasma and Agriculture” by publishing numerous research reports over the past years. A first special issue (S.I.) devoted to the topic appeared in 2018 under the guest editorships of professors M. Gherardi (Bologna, Italy), N. Puač (Belgrade, Serbia), and M. Shiratani (Fukuoka, Japan).[1] During the intervening period, this important area of applied plasma research has continued to evolve and flourish, to the point that we are now presenting this second S.I. on this same topic. The 3rd International Workshop on Plasma Agriculture (IWOPA 2020) was scheduled to take place from March 1 to 4, 2020, in Greifswald, Germany, organized at the Leibniz Institute for Plasma Science and Technology (INP) under the chairmanship of Prof. K.D. Weltmann. However, the workshop had to be canceled when the COVID 19 pandemic broke out in early 2020. Many of the studies presented in this S.I. were scheduled for presentation at the IWOPA 2020 workshop. We have decided to proceed with publication and are proud to present research of the workshop's speakers in this new S.I., “Plasma and Agriculture II”. The 3rd IWOPA, hosted by the INP Greifswald, will now take place virtually from March 1 to 3, 2021 (www.iwopa.org). This current S.I. consists of one review article and 14 original research papers, focusing on state-of-the-art LTP applications in agricultural and food-related fields, ranging from the basics of activating air and water by electrical discharges and the treatment and decontamination of seeds and plants, to LTP use as a food processing technology. All papers have been fully peer-reviewed to the high standards required for publication in PPaP. The review by Ranieri et al.[2] details the role of nonthermal plasma in the development of plants from seeds to crops, and it provides the context to design plasma-based fertilization strategies to address the needs of plants and their ecosystem. Next, several research papers deal with plasma activation of air and water for agricultural purposes, first from general scientific points of view,[3-5] but then also related to specific applications like toxin removal,[6] decontamination of crop seeds,[7] and viniculture.[8] A key subtopic, LTPs in the treatment of seeds and plants, is addressed in five articles, specifically as it applies to wheat,[9] Norway spruce,[10] red clover,[11] rice,[12] and maize and barley.[13] Finally, the last subtopic, LTPs in food technology, comprises three papers dealing with eggs,[14] chicken,[15] and milk.[16] Regrettably, a single contribution to the subject of insect pest control[17] could not be received in time for this S.I., but it will appear in a later issue of this journal in 2021. Altogether, this collection of original research articles bears witness to world-wide interest, as well as growing maturity and sophistication in this strategically important subject, “Plasma and agriculture”; these papers originate from laboratories in the USA, several Asian countries, and several countries throughout Europe. Clearly, the subject is one of steadily advancing impact for humankind and for the overall wellbeing of our environment. Finally, we wish to thank all contributors to this special issue, the reviewers of these articles, and the editorial staff of PPaP for their outstanding support. We hope that this issue will contribute to further understanding of the field, to enhance the state of the art of plasma agricultural applications, and that it will help promote interdisciplinary collaborations between plasma scientists, plant biologists, agricultural experts, and food technologists. Such interactions are, of course, essential to clarify mechanisms that underlie these new processes and, in future, to implement and upscale the associated technologies.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,321
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,490

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,236
Écart entre enseignants0,228 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle