Applications of Discrete Markov Chains to Baseball Analysis
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
There are two fundamental notions which justify the use of Markov chains in the analysis of baseball game outcomes. The first is simply a statement of the consequences of the rules of Baseball itself-- namely that for any batter, exactly one of three possible outcomes will have occurred by the time their turn at bat is finished. They will have scored a run, or they will find themselves on base, or they will be “out”. As a consequence, the evolving state of a game of baseball can be entirely characterized in terms of batters in sequence moving from their turn at bat into the appropriate variation of one of these three foundational “states”. In particular, from the beginning of a half-inning to its conclusion, every single possible configuration of bases occupied, number of outs, and number of points scored can therefore be arranged sequentially and, as I will demonstrate, the discrete Markov chain is the perhaps the most natural framework in which to do this. The second fundamental notion is the justification for why, if we create a matrix of transition probabilities representing the transition from one “state of the field”, or “arrangement of players on bases” to the next, this matrix should in fact be a Markov chain. The key is this: since the states being transitioned through in this proposed matrix are exactly the state of the field of play at the time a given batter takes their turn at the mound, and the subsequent state after a batter has taken his turn depends solely upon the performance characteristics of that batter (this is a crucial point, as indeed the next state de facto depends upon the performance of the defenders in the field, but statistically their effects and any others may be aggregated into some “average” performance of the batter), it is logically equivalent then to say that the past states of the game have no bearing on what state will be reached next. The Markov property is satisfied precisely because the state of the game after a batter has taken their turn rests entirely on the shoulders of that batter, without regard to what the batters before have done. Taken together, these two notions suggest a way to construct a Markov chain which will model each state of play which the game passes through from the start of a half-inning to its conclusion.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle