MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3120630348 · doi:10.1353/jeu.2020.0025

Cameras and Constructs and Cancels, Oh My! Thinking Through Youth and Celebrity

2020· article· en· W3120630348 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Maria Alberto

Notice bibliographique

RevueJeunesse Young People Texts Cultures · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueGender, Feminism, and Media
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésYouth cultureSociologyIdentity (music)Media studiesHuman sexualityFandomPoliticsGender studiesArtAestheticsPolitical scienceLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Cameras and Constructs and Cancels, Oh My!Thinking Through Youth and Celebrity Maria Alberto (bio) Duvall, Spring-Serenity, editor. Celebrity and Youth: Mediated Audiences, Fame Aspirations, and Identity Formation. Lang, 2019. 236 pp. $54.95 pb. ISBN 9781433143090. Mediated Youth Series. Lyga, Barry, and Morgan Baden. The Hive. Kids Can, 2019. 416 pp. $18.99 hc. ISBN 9781525300608. Reid, Raziel. Kens. Penguin, 2018. 256 pp. $17.99 hc. ISBN 9780735263772. Gershowitz, Jordan. Ignore the Trolls. Illustrated by Sandhya Prabhat, Pow! Kids Books, 2019. 32 pp. $17.99 hc. ISBN 9781576879337. With the collection Celebrity and Youth: Mediated Audiences, Fame Aspirations, and Identity Formation, editor Spring-Serenity Duvall and her contributors set out to interrogate the many complex, multi-faceted connections between youth and celebrity. As Duvall promises readers in her introduction, Celebrity and Youth offers a rich, interdisciplinary dive into the many strands connecting these two concepts, including social media, political meaning-making, explorations of sexuality and ageing, parasocial relationships, fandom, and identity work, among others. This collection is a timely addition to the growing body of interdisciplinary work on celebrity culture, particularly with its focus on how social constructions and conceptions of "youth" help to produce and impact wider perceptions of what "celebrity" is in the first place. Because each term tends to be used broadly and uncritically, Duvall begins by acknowledging that both youth and celebrity are complex, socially constructed phenomena. She then considers how more nuanced definitions demonstrate the problems with such common conceptions as "Celebrity culture is youth-obsessed and young people are obsessed with celebrities" (1). Duvall points out that this kind of simple causation statement actually abridges or outright overlooks particular dynamics of power, consumer preferences, and other [End Page 160] simultaneous factors (1). Throughout this collection, Duvall and her contributors address such oversights through a range of interdisciplinary analyses that explore how young people—from preteens to teens and even young adults—interact with the concept of celebrity as identity work, a pathway to economic success, or an avenue into learning about global issues, among other reasons. Contributors' analyses build from a diverse range of case studies conducted across the UK, the EU, the US, and Canada, and privilege young people's own interactions with celebrity. The result is an interesting and compelling interdisciplinary work replete with insights that should prove valuable to readers across a range of disciplines themselves. YA-savvy readers in particular might see interesting reflections of concepts from this collection in recent fiction aimed at readers of the same demographics. Barry Lyga and Morgan Baden's The Hive, for instance, grapples with hyperscrutiny, technological manipulation, and the issues that can come of having users—particularly teenagers—"live" parts of their lives on social media for public consumption. The Hive follows Cassie, the teenage daughter of a recently deceased hacker, as she finds herself a social pariah on the run after making a morbid joke about the sitting president on social media. Her post costs Cassie because, in The Hive, Americans' social media usage is aggregated on a platform called BLINQ, where user reactions are collated into trends called "Levels" and mobs are encouraged to sanction users whose posts generate high Levels of collective condemnation. With this as its backdrop, The Hive brings together an uncanny technological uneasiness reminiscent of Black Mirror with a gamified struggle for survival that should look familiar to anyone who has read The Hunger Games. The result is the creation of a dystopian near future in which the conferral of microcelebrity can become a real punishment for unlucky teenagers. Lyga and Baden's version of microcelebrity becomes especially sinister in the ways in which it contorts the three elements that Ana Jorge and Thays Nunes see as defining teenage microcelebrity: courting audience attention (Celebrity and Youth 40-41), then "successfully managing these connections" (41), and finally, using social media platforms in self-aware ways (41). In The Hive, though, each of these three features of teenage microcelebrity has been warped by BLINQ. Cassie does not court the scope of audience attention she actually receives, cannot possibly "manage" the narrative that her single post is spun into, and later discovers that the BLINQ [End Page 161...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,029
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,095

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,005
Communication savante0,0100,011
Science ouverte0,0010,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0290,007

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,285
Écart entre enseignants0,258 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJeunesse Young People Texts CulturesMême sujetGender, Feminism, and MediaTravaux en français237 207