MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3120812855 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1687

1506. Burden of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) and Other Lower Respiratory Tract Viral Infections During the First Two Years of Life: a Prospective Study

2020· article· en· W3120812855 sur OpenAlexaff
Shabir A. Madhi, Ana Ceballos, Jo Ann Colas, Luis Cousin, Ulises D’Andrea, Ilse Dieussaert, Joseph B. Domachowske, Janet A. Englund, Sanjay Gandhi, Gerco Haars, Mélanie Hercor, Magali de Heusch, Lisa Jose, Joanne M. Langley, Amanda Leach, Peter Silas, Jamaree Teeratakulpisarn, Timo Vesikari, Sonia Stoszek

Notice bibliographique

RevueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueRespiratory viral infections research
Établissements canadiensNova Scotia Health AuthorityIzaak Walton Killam Health CentreDalhousie University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineRespiratory tract infectionsLower respiratory tract infectionHuman metapneumovirusBronchiolitisRhinovirusPediatricsPneumoniaProspective cohort studyInternal medicineRespiratory system

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) are a leading cause of pediatric morbidity and mortality worldwide, with ~650,000 deaths recorded in < 5-year-olds in 2016. Cross-sectional studies on hospitalized LRTIs are available, but longitudinal studies on the total burden of viral LRTIs are scarce. This study (NCT01995175) prospectively collected incident RSV and other viral LRTIs in a multinational cohort. Methods From 2013 to 2017, infants in 8 countries were enrolled at birth and followed for LRTIs up to 2 years of age. Infants with suspected LRTIs were clinically examined and swabbed. Nasal swab samples were tested using quantitative real-time PCR for RSV and multiplex PCR panel for 16 other respiratory viruses/subtypes; bacterial culture was not performed. LRTI and severe LRTI episodes were defined per 2015 WHO LRTI case definitions. Viruses detected from nasal swabs collected from participants with WHO-defined LRTI and severe LRTI episodes are reported. Results The 2401 infants followed experienced 1012 LRTI episodes; 259 of these were severe LRTIs. At least 1 virus was detected from 909 (90%) and 235 (91%) LRTI and severe LRTI episodes, respectively. Enteroviruses/Rhinoviruses (EV/RV, 49%) were detected most frequently in samples collected from LRTI episodes, followed by RSV (22%), parainfluenza (PIV, 14%), human metapneumovirus (hMPV, 8%) and seasonal coronavirus (CoV, 6%). RSV was detected in 39% of samples from LRTI episodes in < 3-month-olds and in 18% of 1-year-olds (Table 1). In a similar trend, RSV was detected in 47% of samples from severe LRTI episodes in < 3-month-olds and in 21% of 1-year-olds (Table 2). Co-infection with another virus was common in CoV-positive samples (67%), while most samples positive for RSV (71%), hMPV (70%), EV/RV (67%) and PIV (58%) had no other virus detected. Table 1. Occurrence of laboratory confirmed respiratory viral infections by viral pathogens identified in nasal swab samples from WHO-defined LRTI episodes Table 2. Occurrence of laboratory confirmed respiratory viral infections by viral pathogens identified in nasal swab samples from WHO-defined severe LRTI episodes Conclusion Respiratory viruses are detected in the majority of LRTIs during the first 2 years of life. RSV likely accounts for much of this overall LRTI burden. Our results suggest that RSV most strongly impacted the very young; it was the most commonly detected virus in severe LRTIs in infants aged < 3 months. RSV was also persistently detected at high levels in samples from LRTIs (22%) and severe LRTIs (28%) in children up to 2 years old. Funding GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA Disclosures Ana Ceballos, MD, GSK group of companies (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Jo Ann Colas, MSc, GSK group of companies (Consultant) Luis Cousin, MD, Tecnología en Investigación (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Ilse Dieussaert, IR, GSK group of companies (Employee, Shareholder) Joseph B. Domachowske, MD, Astra Zeneca (Other Financial or Material Support, Grant/Research Support paid to my Institution on my behalf for sponsored human clinical trial activities)GSK group of companies (Other Financial or Material Support, Grant/Research Support paid to my Institution on my behalf for sponsored human clinical trial activities)Merck (Other Financial or Material Support, Grant/Research Support paid to my Institution on my behalf for sponsored human clinical trial activities) Janet A. Englund, MD, AstraZeneca (Scientific Research Study Investigator)GSK group of companies (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Meissa vaccines (Consultant)Merck (Scientific Research Study Investigator)Sanofi Pasteur (Consultant) Sanjay Gandhi, MD, GSK group of companies (Employee) Mélanie Hercor, PhD, GSK group of companies (Employee) Magali de Heusch, PhD, GSK group of companies (Employee) Joanne M. Langley, MD, GSK group of companies (Research Grant or Support)Immunivaccines Inc (Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support)Janssen (Research Grant or Support)Pfizer (Research Grant or Support)Symvivo (Scientific Research Study Investigator, Research Grant or Support)VBI Vaccines (Research Grant or Support) Amanda Leach, MRCPCH, GSK group of companies (Employee) Timo Vesikari, MD, PhD, Denka (Consultant) Sonia K. Stoszek, PhD, GSK group of companies (Employee, Shareholder)

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,019
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,031
Tête enseignante GPT0,344
Écart entre enseignants0,313 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesMême sujetRespiratory viral infections researchTravaux en français237 207