MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3121547657 · doi:10.4103/ijo.ijo_2754_20

Albrecht von Graefe and the foundation of scientific ophthalmology

2021· article· en· W3121547657 sur OpenAlex
Corinne Doria

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueIndian Journal of Ophthalmology · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHistory of Medicine Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineOphthalmologyClassicsArt historyHistory

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Friedrich Wilhelm Ernst Albrecht von Graefe (or Gräfe; May 22, 1828 – July 20, 1870). Source:http://ihm.nlm.nih.gov/images/B13143Albrecht von Graefe is considered one of the founding fathers of modern ophthalmology. On his 150thdeath anniversary, we intend to remember his career and accomplishments, and his contributions in putting ophthalmology on a sound scientific foundation. Born in Berlin in 1828, Albrecht von Graefe was the son of Karl Ferdinand von Graefe (1787–1840), professor of medicine and surgery at the University of Berlin, and of Augusta von Alten (1797–1857). His parents were acquainted to the Polish and Austrian high society and fervent Francophiles.[12] After receiving his primary education from private tutors, he frequented the French gymnasium. In 1843, he enrolled at the University of Berlin and passed the state medical examination in the winter 1847–1848.[34] In the summer of 1848, von Graefe began a “grand tour” across Europe to perfect his medical education. In the first half of the 19thcentury, medical education in Germany was grounded in theoretical, nonapplied knowledge. This was not the case in other parts of Europe, where the study of medicine was closer to clinical research. For two and a half years, von Graefe travelled throughout Europe studying and working with the most renowned physicians of his time. His first stop was Prague (summer-fall 1848). He studied ocular diseases with Carl Ferdinand von Arlt (1812–1887) and decided to specialize in ophthalmology. His next stop was Paris (winter 1848–1849). Since the first decades of the century, French scientific institutions, such as the Sorbonne, the Collège de France, and the Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle, had attracted physicians and scientists from around the world. They formed a new type of research community that considered empirical clinical observations as important as theoretical knowledge. Graefe became part of this vibrant international network. He studied experimental physiology with Claude Bernard (1813–1878) and worked with him on numerous physiological problems, including the function of the extraocular muscles and optic nerves. He also studied with Julius Sichel (1802–1868) and Louis Auguste Desmarres (1810–1882), two of the most prominent ophthalmic surgeons of their time. Between 1849 and 1850, Graefe moved to Austria to work with Eduard Jaeger (1818–1884). At the time, a reform of the faculties of medicine had been just passed that gave university professors a large degree of autonomy. Some of them decided to follow the example of Parisian institutions by integrating clinical practice in medical education. Jaeger was among those who made that choice. He put his patients at Graefe's disposal, and let him teach some of his students. In July 1850, von Graefe was again in Prague, where he spent 2 weeks at von Arlt's clinic, perfecting his skills in cataract surgery.[5] He went then to London, where he met William Bowman (1816–1892), surgeon at Moorfield Eye Hospital, and Francis Cornelis Donders (1818–1889), director of the Netherlands Hospital for Eye Patients.[3] Graefe's return to Berlin and the foundation of modern ophthalmology In November 1850, Graefe was back in Berlin. He opened an eye clinic on the model of those he had seen in France. There, he provided medical consulting, treatment, teaching, and research. Facilities of this kind played an important role in the development of medical specialization in Germany.[6] Medical specialization is a relatively recent phenomenon. For centuries, specialized medical practice existed outside official medicine. Healers who performed operations on specific parts of the body were dentists, oculists, and bonesetters. They transmitted their knowledge orally and empirically, and occupied a low position in the medical hierarchy. Until the 1850s, medical specialization developed unevenly across Europe. Ophthalmology was one of the first fields to organize as a structured specialty. Chairs of ocular surgery were established in France in 1765 (Paris) and 1788 (Montpellier), but the outbreak of the French Revolution put an end to the development of French ophthalmology for nearly 50 years. In Austria, the teaching of ophthalmology was introduced in 1773 by Empress Maria Theresa. In 1812, a professorship in ophthalmology was established at the University of Vienna did not lead to further developments. In Germany, the University of Berlin offered a course in ophthalmology from 1828. The same year, the Charité Hospital established an eye clinic. From the middle of the century, specialists gradully grew in number and became a recognizable social category. They opened private clinics combining teaching and medical research. Medical specialization became perceived simultaneously as a form of knowledge and practice. The specialized physician began to be associated with medical progress, and to be considered as more competent than a general practitioner because of his ability to deal with difficult cases. By the 1890s, the “battle” for the acceptance of specialties within traditional medical institutions and the general public was won.[7] Graefe's clinic became a reference point for the treatment of eye diseases, attracting patients, students, and assistants.[5] They flocked from all over the world to attend his lessons, which he gave in German, French, and English. He had numerous assistants from Europe: Argyll Robertson (1837–1909) from Edinburgh, John Soelberg Wells (1824–1879) from London, Sir Henry Rosborough Swanzy (1844–1913) from Dublin, Andreas Anagnostakis (1826–1897) from Athens, Robert Blessig (1830–1878) from St. Petersburg, Eduard Junge (1832–1898) from Moskow, Carl Waldenhauer (1820–1899) from Riga, Henri Dor (1835–1912) from Bern, Friedrich Horne (1831–1886) from Zürich, Edmund Hansen Grut (1831–1907) from Copenhagen; others came from North America: Eklanan Williams (1822–1888) from Cincinnati, Aaron Friedenwald (1836–1902) from Baltimore, Charles Stedman Bull (1844–1914) from New York, and Francis Buller (1844–1905) from Montreal. In 1854, Graefe founded the Arkiv für Ophthalmologie, the first specialized scientific journal in ophthalmology published in a German state. He was also at the origins of the foundation of the German Ophthalmological Society (1857), the oldest medical scientific association in the world. By the age of 30, Graefe was one of the most renowned ophthalmologists of the time.[89] In 1867, he presided over the third International Congress of Ophthalmology held in Paris. In 1870, he was elected as foreign member of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.[45] Graefe is applied in his profession a rigorous method based on clinical observations and experimental practice. He was among the first practitioners to make a systematic use of the ophthalmoscope. Invented in 1851 by Hermann von Helmholtz (1821–1894), this instrument made possible for the first time in history to observe the posterior segment of a living eye. The use of the ophthalmoscope let von Graefe making numerous contributions in the physiology and pathology of the eye. He discovered that the fusion of the two images from both eyes into a coherent image occurred not in the retina but in the brain. He identified three subtypes of glaucoma; he introduced iridectomy to relieve intraocular pressure and applied this procedure to treat iritis and iridochoroiditis.[10] He introduced the linear extraction for cataracts, reducing infections in the cornea. He also invented a specific knife equipped with a narrow, pointed blade that minimized the egress of aqueous humor. Von Graefe also improved the surgical treatment of strabismus. He had the idea of sharing the surgical correction on the two eyes, intervening on the healthy eye to correct a squint. He also described different cases of hemianopsias, postulating that homonymous hemianopsias were due to unilateral cerebral disease.[1112] Von Graefe died in Berlin on July 20, 1870 [Fig. 1]. He left an impressive number of publications that form an unequalled repository of knowledge and a monument to the early years of scientific ophthalmology. His commitment to his profession, his dedication to his patients, students, and colleagues, and his relentless work for creating an international community of eye specialists remain foundational in modern ophthalmology.Figure 1: Statue and memorial of Albrecht von Graefe in Berlin. Source:Manfred Brückels, Own work, Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Étude de cas · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,551
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,003
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,045
Tête enseignante GPT0,278
Écart entre enseignants0,233 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle