MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W312176715 · doi:10.1177/003685040909200314

The Present Position of the Darwinian Theory

2009· review· en· W312176715 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.
aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.

Notice bibliographique

RevueScience Progress · 2009
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueEvolution and Science Education
Établissements canadiensRoyal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDarwinismPosition (finance)EpistemologyEvolutionary biologyBiologyPhilosophyEconomics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

And there arose another king that knew not Joseph. must be admitted that the Darwinian theory of evolution by natural selection has fallen upon evil days. Prominent literary men like G.K. Chesterton have allowed themselves to talk of the dead dogma of Darwinism. Although the connotation of Darwinism in the minds of such emotional and inexact writers is somewhat obscure, nevertheless they reflect an impression which they have imbibed from scientific acquaintances, viz. that our views on many things connected with life have changed since Darwin's time, and that most of Darwin's arguments will no longer hold. They cannot be blamed for conceiving this idea, for to a hearer of the discussion on evolution which took place last September at the meeting of the British Association at Hull (1), it must have seemed clear that many zoologists and botanists were inclined to deny that natural selection was the efficient agent in the formation of new Prof. Stanley Gardiner from the standpoint of zoology, and Prof. Johannsen on the botanical side, both emphasised the inadequacy of natural selection, whilst if we turn to Dr. Willis's Age and Area--a book which really gave rise to the discussion--we find the statement (p. 215): It is clear that it is no longer safe to consider that advantage to the species has had anything to do with the actual evolution of that species. Most serious of all, if we refer to Dr. Bateson's address to the American Association for the Advancement of Science on the occasion of their Toronto meeting in 1921 (2), we find the statement: That particular and essential bit of the theory of evolution which is concerned with the origin and nature of species remains is concerned with the origin and nature of species remains utterly mysterious. We no longer feel as we used to do that the process of variation, now contemporaneously occurring, is the beginning of a work which needs merely the element of time for its completion. is within the recollection of all that Bateson's address was made the pretext for a widespread and virulent attack on Darwinian teaching, an attack which was largely taken up throughout the United States and Canada, and very nearly led to the passing of a law prohibiting the teaching of evolution in the state of Kansas. If we now endeavour to form a judgment as to how far this very general dissatisfaction with the Darwinian theory is justified, the first step must be to turn to the authoritative presentation of that theory contained in the sixth and last edition of the Origin of Species. is boldly outlined in the first five chapters, the remainder of the book being occupied with answers to innumerable objections. In the first chapter the great variability of our domestic animals and cultivated plants is described; in the second Darwin deals with the of wild He points out that systematists who believed in the origin of each species as a distinct act of creation, nevertheless recognised subspecies and varieties which they regarded as described by descent from the main species; and that no line could be drawn between subspecies and species, because what some naturalists regarded subspecies others regarded as true He admits that the word variation is of vague and uncertain import. may mean a monstrosity, i.e. a considerable deviation from normal structure, or it may indicate the slight differences which distinguish the offspring of the same parent from one another. He expresses a doubt as to whether monstrosities such as frequently occur in domestic productions are ever permanently propagated in a state of nature. The second type of variation, on the contrary, he regards as of the highest importance: he states that such variations lead, by insensible steps, to the differences separating slight varieties and through these to the differences between well-marked varieties, and so to the differences separating subspecies and …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,992
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,006
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0020,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,072
Tête enseignante GPT0,363
Écart entre enseignants0,291 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle