COMPETITIVENESS OF CANADIAN AGRI-FOOD EXPORTS AGAINST COMPETITORS IN ASIA: 1980-97
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Asia is the second largest market for the Canadian agri-food exports after the United States market. The competition in Asia has become more intensive in recent years as the agri-food sector in developed nations such as Australia, Canada, Europe, and the United States has increasingly relied on exports for growth because of their own slow-growing domestic food consumption. How did the performance of Canadian agri-food exports to Asia measure up to the performances of its main competitors? This research attempts to identify Canada's competitiveness in agri-food exports to Asia, relative to Canada's main competitors. The analysis is based on the 1980-97 trade data from the World Trade Analyzer (WTA), produced by the International Trade Division of Statistics Canada. According to their average market shares during the 1980-97 period, Canada's main competitors in Asia are the United States, Europe, Australia, China, Thailand, Malaysia, Taiwan, Indonesia and New Zealand. To assess each country's competitiveness, this research applies the Constant Market Share (CMS) model. The change in each country's exports is primarily divided into the structural and the competitive effects. The exporting country with larger competitive effect is considered to be more competitive. The key results are: * All exporting countries increased their agri-food exports to Asia during the 1980-97 period. The increase in their exports to Asia can be primarily attributed to the structural effect - particularly to the large increase of total Asian agri-food imports (growth effect). * Canada ranked second after China in terms of competitive effect during the 1980-1997 period. Indonesia and Thailand also exhibit strong competitiveness in Asia. Canada's traditional competitors such as the United States, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand were found to be non-competitive. * Compared with other competitors in the Asian market, Canada exhibit two areas of weakness. First, Canada did not concentrate their agri-food exports to Asia on fast-growing commodities such as consumer-ready products. Second, Canada's competitiveness was deteriorated in the processed intermediate goods in Korea and South Asia, the consumer-ready goods in Japan and Asia 7, and the bulk commodities in Taiwan. If Asia was considered to be a target region for Canadian agri-food exports, one would need not only to know the exporting strategies that will be adopted by countries such as the United States, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand, but also those adopted by countries such as China, Indonesia and Thailand. In order for Canada to maintain and improve its export performance in Asia in the future, it will be most effective if Canada could increase its market shares of processed intermediate goods in Korea and South Asia, the consumer-ready goods in Japan and Asia 7, and the bulk commodities in Taiwan.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».