The Observation and Experiment of Field dependence/Field Independence Based on R&T Users' Behavioral of Information Searching/OBSERVATION ET EXPÉRIMENTATION DE LA DÉPENDANCE DE CHAMP/ INDÉPENDANCE DE CHAMP BASÉES SUR LE COMPORTEMENT DE RECHERCHE D'INFORMATION DES UTILISATEURS R&T
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract: Analysis the R&T users' behavioral of information seeking based on the theory of field independence/field dependence and take experiments on the analysis. It is of great meaning to make research from the angle. Choose university students as example to take empirical datum analysis and. Key words: R&T Users, field dependence/field independence, information seeking, cognitive style, experiment Resume: Le present article vise a analyser, sur la base de la theorie de dependance de champ/independance de champ, le comportement de recherche d'information des utilisateurs R&T et a faire l'experimentation sur l'analyse. Il est de grande signification d'entreprendre les recherches sous cet angle. On choisit des etudiants universitaires comme exemples pour accomplir l'analyse des donnees empiriques. Mots-Cles: utilisateurs R&T, dependance de champ/independance de champ, recherche d'information, style cognitif, experimentation 1. INTRODUCTION In psychology, cognition refers to individual gain and the internal information processing of psychological activity. Its research area includes information choice, inputting, coding, storing as well as extraction and so on. The cognition process is a process in which an individual obtains, code, store, extract and use the information and also including a series of continual cognition operation according to certain procedure system. The cognitive style refers to an individual's performance in the information processing that is the unique style kept by him. There are many kinds of views about how the cognition style should be classified. At present, three kinds of basic classification are proposed, that is from the cognition, the personality and the move to classify the cognitive style. In this paper, the field independence/field dependence classification we studied here was proposed by Witkin in 1964, who took the cognition as the central viewpoint and more concerned the characteristic of cognitive process style. The 'field' means the environment. It has great influence to human's consciousness. The cognitive style about field independence/field dependant firstly proposed for resolving the problem about individual difference, mainly referring to the consciousness of an individual whether it is referenced by the external field of vision or by body itself as the contrast. During the entire information searching process, we may see the field independence and the field interdependence phenomenon anywhere. The independent user is good at utilizing each kind of method for finding the correct answer, while the field dependent user is short of this ability. In order to study the science and technology users' information searching behavior, from the field independence/field dependence angel is meaningful to the more widespread discussion about the problem. This paper has mainly done the following work: A. Introduced the field independence/field interdependence concept and the present application situations. B. According to above theory foundation, analysis the field independence/field dependence phenomenon during users' information searching in the technical database. C. Carry on the exploring experimental inspection to field independence/field dependence phenomenon. 2. ABOUT FIELD INDEPENDENCE/FIELD DEPENDENCE 2.1 Concept and application of field independence/field dependence The difference between field independence and field dependence is caused by the different space reference location, and then causes different ways to gain information. The field independence refers to the individual locating the space intrinsic reference relying, and obtain the knowledge and information only by one's interesting. And the field independent person favors in changing individual internal reference according to the environment, and more interests in abstract and theory. The field dependency refers to the environment external reference which the individual relies on oneself locates, and considers knowledge and information according to the stimulation of the environment. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,018 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».