MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3122827754

Synthesizing the scientific evidence to inform the development of the post-2020 Global Framework on Biodiversity:Earth Commission Meeting Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice, Convention on Biological Diversity, 24th meeting Montreal, Canada 17-22 August 2020

2020· book· en· W3122827754 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sandra Dı́az, Peter H. Verburg, Noelia Zafra‐Calvo

Notice bibliographique

RevueDigital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) · 2020
Typebook
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesPorticus FoundationStrong
Mots-clésConvention on Biological DiversityBiodiversityCommissionConventionDiversity (politics)Political scienceEnvironmental planningEnvironmental resource managementEngineering ethicsBusinessGeographyLawEcologyEnvironmental scienceEngineeringBiology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This report is the result of a meeting which aimed to offer scientific guidance to the development under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) of the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework focussing on its contribution to the 2030 Mission and 2050 Vision.We provide a synthesis of the scientific and technical justification, evidence base and feasibility for outcome-oriented goals on nature and its contributions to people, including biodiversity at different levels from genes to biomes.The report is structured to respond to the Zero Draft of the post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. We commend: The focus of the 5 high-level goals on the conservation of nature (Goals a-c), its sustained provision of benefits to people (Goal d) and fair and equitable sharing of benefits (Goal e);  The focus, at this high level, on outcomes (results to be achieved) for nature and people;  The focus on different facets of nature (or levels of organization within biodiversity): ecosystems, species and genetic diversity within species, each of them receiving the same level of importance.We stress:  That these goals cannot be fully achieved in isolation.Rather, each of them contributes synergistically to the achievement of the others. That condensing the goals into fewer more compound goals would risk obscuring the multidimensionality of living nature and the complementarity of the outcome goals in achieving the long-term vision of the CBD. The need to consider all ecosystems under the double perspective of conserving nature and ensuring the long-term provision of benefits to people."Natural" ecosystems provide essential benefits to people.At the same time, "managed" ecosystems should not be considered as "lost for nature"; they are places where certain functions of nature are managed to provide specific benefits, Ecosystems (Goal a): No additional loss of critical ecosystems.No net loss by 2030 in both the area and integrity of all "natural" ecosystems compared to 2020, and increases of at least 20% in the area and integrity of "natural" ecosystems by 2050.No net loss of integrity of "managed" ecosystems by 2030, and net gain by 2050.Critical elements:  Take 2020 as reference year for evaluating no net loss, achieving no net loss between 2020 and 2030. Ensure achieving no loss of critical ecosystems, i.e., ecosystems that are rare, vulnerable or essential for planetary function. Ensure like-for-like compensation by having a clear ecosystem definition and no substitution between different ecosystems. Aim for no net loss of both area and integrity in "natural" ecosystems and no net loss of integrity of "managed" ecosystems by 2030.Integrity of "managed" areas should be increased by 2050 to ensure recovery of nature's contributions to people. Maintain a restoration ambition as part of the goals ("net gain in area and integrity") with implementation through integrated planning to optimize benefits for nature and people. Species (Goal b):Species extinction rate and extinction risk are reduced progressively by 2030 and 2050, across the whole Tree of Life, and the local abundance and distributional extent of key functional species and threatened species is stabilized by 2030 and recovered by 2050.Critical elements:  Reduce the rate of extinction progressively. Minimize the loss of evolutionary history, recognizing that species are not equal in this respect. Focus on threatened species to 2030 to prioritize species needing urgent attention, but for 2050, reduce extinction risk across all species, not just the most threatened. Re-establish population abundance within local ecological communities, rather than increasing total population abundance overall, prioritizing species with key functional roles. Include a qualitative statement about retention and eventual recovery of a natural distributional extent of species. Genes (Goal c):By 2030, genetic erosion of all wild and domesticated species is halted and, by 2050, the genetic diversity of populations is restored [to XX%] and their adaptive capacity is safeguarded.Only the highest level of ambition and the consideration of all goals in a synergistic manner are sufficient to achieve the CBD's 2050 Vision.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,054
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,051
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,984
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,284

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0540,051
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0070,008
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,008
Communication savante0,0140,014
Science ouverte0,0020,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0100,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,036
Tête enseignante GPT0,226
Écart entre enseignants0,190 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentnon

Explorer davantage

Même revueDigital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)Même sujetHermeneutics and Narrative IdentityTravaux en français237 207