MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3123234998

Accounting, Organizations, and Institutions: Essays in Honour of Anthony Hopwood

2009· preprint· en· W3123234998 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Christopher S. Chapman, David J. Cooper, Peter Miller

Notice bibliographique

RevueRePEc: Research Papers in Economics · 2009
Typepreprint
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueAccounting and Organizational Management
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Alberta
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAccountingManagement accountingSocial accountingPositive accountingAuditPolitical scienceSociologyPublic relationsAccounting information systemFinancial accountingBusiness
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Accounting has an ever-increasing significance in contemporary society. Indeed, some argue that its practices are fundamental to the development and functioning of modern capitalist societies. We can see accounting everywhere: in organizations where budgeting, investing, costing, and performance appraisal rely on accounting practices; in financial and other audits; in corporate scandals and financial reporting and regulation; in corporate governance, risk management, and accountability, and in the corresponding growth and influence of the accounting profession. Accounting, too, is an important part of the curriculum and research of business and management schools, the fastest growing sector in higher education. This growth is largely a phenomenon of the last 50 years or so. Prior to that, accounting was seen mainly as a mundane, technical, bookkeeping exercise (and some still share that naive view). The growth in accounting has demanded a corresponding engagement by scholars to examine and highlight the important behavioural, organizational, institutional, and social dimensions of accounting. Pioneering work by accounting researchers and social scientists more generally has persuasively demonstrated to a wider social science, professional, management, and policy audience how many aspects of life are indeed constituted, to an important extent, through the calculative practices of accounting. Anthony Hopwood, to whom this book is dedicated, has been a leading figure in this endeavour, which has effectively defined accounting as a distinctive field of research in the social sciences. The book brings together the work of leading international accounting academics and social scientists, and demonstrates the scope, vitality, and insights of contemporary scholarship in and on accounting and auditing. Available in OSO: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/oso/public/content/management/9780199546350/toc.html Contributors to this volume - Thomas Ahrens, University of Warwick, Patricia J. Arnold, Sheldon B. Lubar School of Business, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Jane Baxter, Australian School of Business, University of New South Wales, Alnoor Bhimani, London School of Economics and Political Science, Jacob G. Birnberg, Murphy Professor of Control Systems Emeritus, University of Pittsburgh, Michael Bromwich, London School of Economics and Political Science, Michel Callon, CSI/ENSMP, Salvador Carmona, IE Business School, Madrid, Spain, Christopher S. Chapman, Imperial College Business School, Imperial College London, Wai Fong Chua, Australian School of Business, University of New South Wales, David J. Cooper, School of Business, University of Alberta, Mark A. Covaleski, The Robert Beyer Professor of Managerial Accounting, Graduate School of Business, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Barbara Czarniawska, University of Gothenburg, Mark W. Dirsmith, Deloitte & Touche Professor of Accounting, Smeal College of Business Administration and The Social Thought Program, University Park, Marie-Laure Djelic, ESSEC, Mahmoud Ezzamel, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Christopher Humphrey, University of Manchester, Sten Jonsson, GRI, School of Business, Economics and Law, Goteborg University, Vincent-Antonin Lepinay, STS/MIT Robert Libby, Cornell University, Anne Loft, University of Lund, Peter B. Miller, Department of Accounting, London School of Economic and Political Science, Jan Mouritsen, Copenhagen Business School, Michael Power, London School of Economics and Political Science, Keith Robson, Cardiff Business School, University of Cardiff, Kerstin Sahlin, Uppsala Universitet, Sajay Samuel, Clinical Faculty, Smeal College of Business Administration, University Park Nicholas Seybert, University of Texas at Austin, Michael D. Shields, Schaberg Endowed Chair in Accounting, Michigan State University, Prem Sikka, University of Essex, Hugh Willmott, University of Cardiff, Joni Young, University of New Mexico.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,116
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,277
Écart entre enseignants0,256 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations64
Publié2009
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueRePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsMême sujetAccounting and Organizational ManagementTravaux en français237 207