MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3123279136 · doi:10.2118/201459-ms

Deep-Learning-Based Automated Stratigraphic Correlation

2020· article· en· W3123279136 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Établissements canadiensImpact
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésComputer scienceProbabilistic logicWorkflowArtificial intelligenceRecurrent neural networkField (mathematics)Pairwise comparisonSequence (biology)Deep learningConvolutional neural networkData miningMachine learningArtificial neural network

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Stratigraphic correlation is essential in field evaluation as it provides the necessary tops to compartmentalize the reservoir. It further contributes to other parts of the field development planning cycle such as reservoir modeling, volumetric assessment, production allocation, etc. Traditional approach of manual pairwise correlation is labor-intensive and time-consuming. This research presents a novel automated stratigraphic correlator to create well top and zonation interpretations using supervised machine learning algorithms of Convolutional- and Recurrent-Neural-Networks (CNNs and RNNs). An automated stratigraphic correlator is created that enables stratigraphic well top and zonation interpretations learned from the well logs of a subset of wells with zonation information manually provided by human experts. The method can efficiently learn the patterns and hidden information from the well logs’ sequential data, implicitly capture the domain expertise, and streamline and automate the traditional manual repetitive work. Our method supersedes existing approaches like Multiple Sequence Alignment (MSA) by incorporating domain expertise through tops/zones picked by geologists. A Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) is used to interpret the log data, since deposition by nature is a sequential process and RNNs can intrinsically capture such series. An Inception autoencoder CNN is also applied in this workflow for stratigraphic interpretation. Reliable post-processing is also included using the predicted zone probability logs to quantify the overall confidence score of well zonation, and to correct misinterpretation when necessary using transition frequencies in log data through a linear chain graphical probabilistic model. The methodology is tested on one of the major Middle East oilfields with around 1,500 wells to prove its efficiency and capability. The overall methodology involves data pre-processing, deep learning model training and prediction, and the post-processing of model-predicted results. In this specific workflow, the machine learning targets include both the prediction of zones (multi-class classification/segmentation problem) and the prediction of well tops (edge-detection problem). Thus, a supervised multi-task learning on a single field using CNNs and RNNs is implemented to be able to perform different tasks with the same model. The inputs to the training module include trajectory logs and other measured logs such as gamma-ray, resistivity, neutron density, etc. All inputs are normalized to zero mean and unit standard deviation. For wells with missing log values, the approach can either discard it or perform data imputation to reconstruct the data using different automated algorithms. The machine learning engine uses two different algorithms (BiLSTM and Inception autoencoder CNN), with many other deep learning models tested. The training loss function includes zone categorical cross entropy loss, tops edge detection binary cross entropy loss and L2-norm regularization term. The learning rate is dynamically adjusted during training so that it is reduced when the loss is stalled. The post-processing uses the machine learning predicted zone probability logs to select the zoning sequence that maximizes overall zonation probability and treats it as the confidence score of well zonation. This dramatically helps in constraining the outcome stratigraphic interpretation by geological succession and minimizing the correlation error. The entire workflow has been applied to one major Middle East oilfield with a large number of pre-interpreted well logs, with 60% of the wells used to train the deep learning models, 20% used for validation and the rest are for blind test. Both BiLSTM and Inception autoencoder CNN show close to human-level performance in the blind test dataset. The mean absolute error of well tops interpretation after post-processing is around 3 m throughout all analyzed wells, which provided an accuracy of nearly 90% for the blind test dataset. The classification precision and accuracy also demonstrate close-to-human-level performance in the major zones with sufficient data. It has been noticed that for cases without missing data, Inception autoencoder CNN achieves best performance, while BiLSTM benefits a lot from imputation when missing data exists. The methodology automates and streamlines the originally time-consuming stratigraphic correlation process. It performs better than existing approaches through a well-developed machine learning framework with comprehensive data pre- and post-processing. The resulting stratigraphic correlation proves to be extremely reliable even with a small number of seed wells, and it requires minimal user intervention during the process. Through deep learning techniques such as transfer learning, the proposed methodology can be readily applied to other fields even with limited training data.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,824
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,532

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,262
Écart entre enseignants0,242 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle