Landmark analysis of overall survival (OS) by objective response (OR) in previously treated patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC): Post-hoc analysis of the randomized, phase III KEYNOTE-240 study.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
318 Background: Studies have shown that OR is prognostic of OS in pts with HCC. KEYNOTE (KN)-224 (NCT02702414) evaluated pembrolizumab (pembro; anti-PD-1) in sorafenib (sora)-treated pts with aHCC and demonstrated an OR rate of 17% that was durable in responders receiving pembro, ultimately leading to its FDA approval. In KN-224, a landmark analysis showed that OR in pembro-treated pts was prognostic of longer OS. The KN-240 (NCT02702401) study evaluated pembro + best supportive care (BSC) vs placebo (pbo) + BSC in sora-treated pts with aHCC. Although clinical benefit was observed in KN-240 with pembro vs pbo, prespecified statistical significance criteria for OS and PFS were not met. This post hoc analysis of KN-240 was performed to determine whether OR at landmark is prognostic of longer survival after landmark time. Methods: Eligible pts were aged ≥18 y, had confirmed aHCC, and experienced progression during or after sora treatment or intolerance to sora. Landmark analyses of OS according to OR at 6, 12, and 18 wk after randomization were performed on the pembro arm to examine the association between survival after the landmark with response achieved prior to the landmark. OR was assessed by blinded independent central review per RECIST v1.1. Responders at each landmark were defined as pts with any response assessment of CR or PR before the landmark date; all other pts were defined as nonresponders. HRs and 95% CIs for survival after the landmark were calculated from the Cox proportional model with Efron’s method of tie handling with responder status as a single covariate. Analyses were performed in the ITT population. Results: As of Jan 2, 2019, the median time from randomization to data cutoff was 21.2 months (range 13.4-30.4) for pembro. There were 51 pts (18.3%) with a BOR of CR or PR in the pembro arm and 6 pts (4.4%) with a BOR of PR (no CR) in the pbo arm (excluded from landmark analyses). OS after landmark time was longer for responders compared with nonresponders at the wk 6, 12, and 18 time points (Table). The HR for OS after landmark time for responders versus nonresponders were 0.37 (95% CI 0.18-0.75), 0.39 (95% CI 0.23-0.66), and 0.37 (95% CI 0.21-0.63) at wk 6, 12, and 18, respectively. Conclusions: This post hoc analysis demonstrates that pts with sora-treated aHCC who achieve OR by landmark time with pembro have longer OS after the landmark time, confirming the prognostic association between OR with pembro and OS observed in KN-224. Clinical trial information: NCT02702401. [Table: see text]
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».