Les Vite de 1672 de Bellori : hypothèses de reconstitution du programme iconographique et théorique
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This article presents the evidence for a tentative reconstruction of the theoretical and iconographic programme of Bellori’s Vite. The author seeks to show that Bellori’s biographies are arranged according to a programmatic scheme probably conceived in the late 1630s or early 1640s, during the biographer’s youth, and that this programme is inspired by Lomazzo’s Temple of Painting and the theory of Governors. Published in 1672, the Vite present the lives of twelve artists, following—up to a point—the chronological order of their deaths, as was the rule in that literary genre. However, three of them (Annibale Carracci, Caravaggio, and Domenichino) are out of chronological order, and at the same time divide the whole group into three equal parts. This anomaly is explained by a poem published in 1642 by the young Bellori (as a preface to Baglione’s Vite de’Pittori) in which he classified modern artists according to the scheme of the three Graces. In the poem, Bellori devoted a complete strophe to each of the artists he would choose as “governors” thirty years later, describing his particular genius and relating him to one of the Graces. The same kind of classification was used by the poet Antonio Bruni, who in Le Tre Gratie (1630) divided poetry into three broad categories: lyric, heroic, and moral and sacred. Each of these categories is governed by one of the Graces. Bruni asserts that his aim is to classify poetry with greater clarity and avoid the confusion generated by the mixture of different genres in a single poem. A study of the emblematic etchings that precede the biographies confirms this analysis. Apparently the Idea, which was to become so famous in European academies of art, was added to the work very late, almost at the moment of printing. This late addition was the cause of some confusion at the printer’s desk, with the result that this etching was misplaced in the text. Nevertheless the scheme of the programme appears very clearly. The three governors are associated with three concepts: Theoria, Praxis, and Conceptus-Imaginatio. The other three etchings in each group are related to the main theme and explain it. This figurative complement to the biographies testifies to the importance and vitality of such figurative and theoretical sources as Testa’s Liceo della Pittura, also designed in the late 1630s. The iconographic analysis of the etchings shows that Bellori apparently adhered closely to the three-level educational programme defined by Testa for the perfect painter, seeking at the same time to reconcile schools and styles of the modern period in his Ideal Temple of Painting. Despite what has often been said, it was not his intention to oppose Poussin to Caravaggio, nor did he aim to write mere biographies of individuals.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,016 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,019 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,010 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,014 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».