Trade Facilitation in India: An Analysis of Trade Processes and Procedures
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Moving goods across borders requires meeting a vast number of commercial, transport and regulatory requirements.Inefficiencies in complying with these requirements often create unnecessary delays and costs.A source of tremendous inefficiencies is associated with the preparation of transport and regulatory documents, unclear border procedures, and overzealous cargo inspection.We need to understand how much these add to the costs of doing business across border and which way they affect the growth in trade.Besides, estimating time and costs of the procedures and processes would help policy makers and other stakeholders to enhance the regional and global trade.This study undertakes Business Process Analysis (BPA) to help assess the trade processes and procedures.One of the research objectives in BPA is to identify administrative and procedural barriers that unnecessarily impede the participation of more firms and more countries in regional and global trade, and propose solutions.Our BPA covers India's exports of cotton yarn to Bangladesh, fresh vegetables to Gulf and fruits to EU, and India's import of rubber tyres from Sri Lanka.The BPA maps show total time taken to complete the export procedures is about 31 days, which is very high compared to any international benchmark.The maximum time goes into getting payment from Bangladeshi importer, whereas transportation of goods comes next to it.The whole process costs an average of US$ 542 per container, of which insurance and inland transportation cost are the major components.This study also suggests that besides tariff, bottlenecks are in inland transportation, customs clearance and getting payment from importer.Unlike export of cotton yarn, the export of vegetables to Gulf is not executed through letter of credit or advance payment.However, the export of fruits to EU is done on the basis of advance payment in our particular case study.It takes about 29 days for export of vegetables and 33 days for export of fruits till the payment is received from the importers.The maximum time goes into sending the goods from India to EU, whereas payment comes next to it.In case of export of vegetables, getting payment from importer takes the most of the time, whereas transportation time comes next to it.The whole process of exporting vegetables costs an average of US$ 1573 per container, whereas the average cost is US$ 2031 per container in case of export of fruits to EU.However, in both cases, transportation cost (domestic and international) has been the major trade barrier.The time-procedure charts show that total time taken to complete the trade procedures is about 29 days for vegetables and 33 days for fruits.It also suggests that bottlenecks are in transportation, customs clearance and getting payment from importer.In case of import of rubber tyres from Sri Lanka, the trade processes and procedures are relatively simple.The import procedure of rubber tyres consists in placing order from Indian office to Sri Lankan subsidiary, clearing custom at Indian port, unloading the goods and inland transportation.It takes about 17 days to import rubber tyres from Sri Lanka including settling the payment.Contrary to popular belief, the maximum time actually goes into making the payment.Cost of inland transportation is also major barrier to trade.The whole process of importing rubber tyres costs an average of US$ 360 per container with a maximum and minimum range of US$ 393 and US$ 326, respectively.Overall, the time and cost of trade processes and procedures estimated in this study call for greater attention to trade facilitation.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».