MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W312563668

THE ETHICS OF PEACEMAKING: THE GENESIS OF CALLED TOGETHER TO BE PEACEMAKERS—REPORT OF THE INTERNATIONAL MENNONITE-CATHOLIC DIALOGUE (2004)

2010· article· en· W312563668 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Drew Christiansen

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of ecumenical studies · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueReligion, Society, and Development
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSociologyMillerGeneral partnershipPeacemakingInterpretation (philosophy)LawPolitical scienceTheologyPhilosophy
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction A. A Latecomer I came to International Mennonite-Catholic Dialogue one born out of time. The dialogue had already been underway for two years when l was asked in 2000 to present a paper to dialogue members assembled near Karlsruhe, Germany, on topic What Is a Peace Church? l was then named as a consultant, not an official member, of Catholic team. In fact, I functioned as a full member, working even on drafting team of final report and serving as expert for both sides in 2007 meeting on World Council of Churches' Decade to Overcome Violence. I note my status simply to indicate that I do not have experience of those who participated in dialogue for full five years, nor do I have overview of process possessed by team leaders on both sides: Larry Miller, general secretary of Mennonite World Conference, and Msgr. John Radano, formerly chief of Western department of Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity. They both are certainly more knowledgeable of dynamics of relationship between two communities and particularly of evolution of overall Mennonite-Catholic relationship, including behind-thescenes difficulties and decisions that affected final outcome. B. The Place of Ethics In addition, i bring to interpretation of our work perspective of an ethicist, who in his career has only accidentally been an ecumenist. I am not especially versed in ecumenical theology and documentary heritage of many dialogues. Most of my ecumenical work has been done with ecumenical collaborations on social- and international-policy matters, such as National Religious Partnership for Environment and Churches for Middle East Peace, rather than in conversation. As a result, ! have an incomplete view of dialogue. (1) In categories of field, I have participated more in the dialogue of action and the dialogue of life than in formal theological exchange or the dialogue of religious experience. (2) Nevertheless, peacemaking was a key component in Mennonite-Catholic Dialogue, as indicated by title of quinquennial report, Called Together to Be Peacemakers (3) (C.T.B.P.), a title not without its critics, precisely because of ethical tilt it appears to give whole document, obscuring much else of importance. The Mennonite commitment to peacemaking, however, was very much at center of Holy See's special hope for this dialogue and of growing interest of many Catholics, then and now, in Mennonite tradition as witnessed by Bridgefolk movement in United States and Canada. (4) So, as an ethicist, especially as one who had taught alongside John Howard Yoder, leading Mennonite theologian of last half of twentieth century, and as one who had staffed United States Catholic Conference positions on war and peace for a decade-and-a-half, I did hold some special qualifications for my involvement. (5) Also, Catholic teaching on war, peace, and nonviolence has been a specialty of mine. In years that I worked for United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (U.S.C.C.B.), 1991-2004, Catholic social teaching underwent an epochal shift in place nonviolence played in Church's teaching on conflict. (6) In addition, while historical section has great salience for Mennonites, and other sections are of interest to both sides, in action-oriented North American context, where issues of war and peace are contested both within and outside churches, issues of pacifism, nonviolence, and just war are of intense interest for members of both denominations. This is especially true at a time when ethics of character and virtue has increased popularity and theologians acknowledge co-penetration of ethics and spirituality. (7) Peacemaking also points to distinctiveness of this dialogue, namely, though there is extensive historical and doctrinal content to report, dialogue had not just an ethical but also a practical, pastoral turn somewhat rare in official dialogues in which Holy See has engaged. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,006
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,038
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,076

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0060,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0150,009
Communication savante0,0080,005
Science ouverte0,0010,006
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,007
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,089
Tête enseignante GPT0,397
Écart entre enseignants0,308 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of ecumenical studiesMême sujetReligion, Society, and DevelopmentTravaux en français237 207