Notice bibliographique
Résumé
FILM FESTIVAL FEVER: RECENT TESTIMONIALS SUNDANCE TO SARAJEVO: FILM FESTIVALS AND THE WORLD THEY MADE Kenneth Turan Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2002, 180 pp. FILM FESTIVAL CONFIDENTIAL William Marshall Toronto: McArthur and Company, 2006, 115 pp. QUEER FILM AND VIDEO FESTIVAL FORUM. TAKE ONE: CURATORS SPEAK OUT, Moving Image Review Edited by Chris Straayer and Tom Waugh GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Cay Studies 11:4 (2005): 579-603. In the past decade the academic gaze in film studies has extended to cover institutions of cinema, particularly exhibition, as part of the cultural analysis of the medium. A mounting number of publications are dedicated to the culture of film festivals, in the light of trends in cultural globalization and the advent of postnational world cinemas. The three texts that I survey here speak to overlapping and sometimes different aspects of this phenomenon and in varying modes, from investigative journalism to insider memoir, but always engaging the first-person experience. This survey anticipates more such work to come.1 Sundance to Sarajevo is a splendid work of journalism by the well-known film critic Kenneth Turan at the L.A. Times. He weaves together autobiographical accounts and anecdotes, often supplemented with interviews. It is certainly not an ethnographic study and lacks a bibliography, notes and index. Turan begins with the curious claim that [n]o one wants to speak against the Bible, but the sentiment in Ecclesiastes famously insisting 'to every thing there is a and a time to every purpose under heaven' in no way applies to the universe of film While film festivals generally may not indeed have any one season, successful individual festivals find their appropriate time and place in the global calendar, a fact Turan establishes, against the grain of his claim above, through his journey to a dozen international film festivals. Turan writes a survey of select film festivals with which he has become acquainted to varying degrees since he began his career as a film critic in 1971 at Cannes. He observes the prolific extent of film festivals worldwide today with, for instance, over one hundred and fifty in Europe and thirty in New York City alone. Their numbers mirror their diversity, exemplified by festivals with specialized themes of spoof films, comedies, mental illness, sexuality, films refused by other festivals, and so on. In his discussion of how the culture industry uses film festivals, Turan refers to Piers Handling's insight that festivals serve as an alternative distribution network. SONY, for example, makes use of festivals as alternative opportunities for advertising and public relations, as they are often far less expensive than more conventional means of promotion. Turan starts with a description of Cannes' urban context, thirty-five thousand guests, the streets, parties, restaurants, the banality of glamour, its notorious hierarchy of press passes, with gossip providing an important social glue next to extreme publicity for those producers that can afford the display. Back in the U.S.A., Turan rightly names the Sundance Festival the flagship of the burgeoning American independent film movement while recounting its history and current setting of Park City, the mountain resort village of six thousand inhabitants that welcomes twenty thousand festival-goers annually. At Sundance cultural capital is formidable, and directors can become famous immediately. Alternatively, Las Vegas's Sho West is the film trade show festival extraordinaire at which Jack Valenti gives his annual state-of-the-industry address, and where audience taste trends are anticipated and marketing strategies honed. Its primary aim, according to Turan, is to bring together exhibitors and distributors in one event. Turan also outlines the effects of the collapse of the Soviet Union on the Havana festival. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,018 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,009 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,008 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,015 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».