Paying Lip Service to Education: An investigation of Teacher Candidates' Perceptions of 21st Century Learning
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This thesis is a study of beginning teachers’ concept of self at the precarious juncture between teacher education and a career in the classroom. Given that the practice of teaching sits at the juncture of past methods and proposed “new” models for teaching and learning, the ways preservice teachers take up the history of teaching in Ontario, their past learning experiences, and personal memories was of significance in understanding how they see themselves as future educators. Situated within curriculum studies, and using currere (Pinar, 1975) as a methodology, this inquiry focuses on the experiences of four Bachelor of Education students at a university in Ontario, Canada. Interviews were structured around the four stages of currere (regressive, progressive, analytic, and synthetic) and sought to unpack how the autobiographical free-associative utterances of teacher candidates might be read with and against the larger context of “21st century teaching and learning” competencies published by the Ontario Ministry of Education which are meant to guide their careers. Using rhetorical analysis to identify the repetitions, ambivalences, metaphors, detours, free associations, and symbolizations in the interviews, the teacher candidate narratives were coded for repetitions and meanings using a psychoanalytic stylistic. Looking at the ways the unconscious performs consciously provides insight into the ways teachers take up existing societal discourses and return to childhood experiences and traumas to forge their emerging teacher identities. The findings of this study indicate that preservice teacher candidates are ambivalent about both the language and implementation strategy of 21st century competencies even as they struggle with their own personal identity formation as educators in relation to the expectations placed upon them from the Ministry. As well, the participants return, in their free associative narratives, to scenes of learning and not-learning in childhood to guide them in their understanding of what it means to be a good teacher in the present moment. Weaving memories of childhood learning with new knowledge acquired in teacher education, each participant defines 21st century learning and its necessary knowledge and appropriate emotional register differently. Th multiplicity of subjectivities that emerges lends rich insight into the differences in teacher identities even as students emerge from the same undergraduate program. Furthermore, this study lays the groundwork for future examination of 21st century learning objectives in a post-COVID-19 context and what the implications might be for new teacher identities as historical discourses of what it means to learn and succeed invariably need to change as students move out of the brick-and-mortar schoolhouse to remote and virtual learning.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,013 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,010 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».