MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3127147430 · doi:10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.01.033

Reimplantation for anomalous right coronary artery

2021· article· en· W3127147430 sur OpenAlex
Juan B. Grau, Kenza Rahmouni, Javier G. Castillo, Marc Ruel, Gyaandeo Maharajh

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJTCVS Techniques · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCoronary Artery Anomalies
Établissements canadiensChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of Ottawa
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineCoronary arteriesRight coronary arteryCardiologyInternal medicineArteryLeft coronary arterySudden deathHypertrophic cardiomyopathyIschemic cardiomyopathyHeart failureCoronary angiographyMyocardial infarctionEjection fraction

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Central MessageCoronary reimplantation is a safe procedure to correct an anomalous origin of the right coronary artery. It should be used whenever possible, as it restores normal anatomic and physiologic conditions.See Commentaries on pages 229 and 231. Coronary reimplantation is a safe procedure to correct an anomalous origin of the right coronary artery. It should be used whenever possible, as it restores normal anatomic and physiologic conditions. See Commentaries on pages 229 and 231. Anomalous aortic origin of coronary arteries is the second most common cause of sudden death after hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.1Brothers J.A. Frommelt M.A. Jaquiss R.D.B. Myerburg R.J. Fraser Jr., C.D. Tweddell J.S. Expert consensus guidelines: anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017; 153: 1440-1457Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (97) Google Scholar It occurs when the left, right, or both coronary arteries do not originate from their respective sinuses of Valsalva. Anomalous origin of the right coronary artery (AAORCA) is significantly more common than the left-sided anomalous aortic origin of coronary arteries.2Law T. Dunne B. Stamp N. Ho K.M. Andrews D. Surgical results and outcomes after reimplantation for the management of anomalous aortic origin of the right coronary artery.Ann Thorac Surg. 2016; 102: 192-198Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (22) Google Scholar Patients with signs of myocardial ischemia should be referred for surgical intervention.1Brothers J.A. Frommelt M.A. Jaquiss R.D.B. Myerburg R.J. Fraser Jr., C.D. Tweddell J.S. Expert consensus guidelines: anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017; 153: 1440-1457Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (97) Google Scholar Several surgical techniques to treat AAORCA have been described, including unroofing, pulmonary artery translocation, coronary artery bypass grafting, and coronary translocation and reimplantation. The latter technique involves reattaching the anomalous coronary to its respective sinus of Valsalva to restore normal physiology. Results from surgical series with right coronary artery (RCA) reimplantation have shown promising outcomes.2Law T. Dunne B. Stamp N. Ho K.M. Andrews D. Surgical results and outcomes after reimplantation for the management of anomalous aortic origin of the right coronary artery.Ann Thorac Surg. 2016; 102: 192-198Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (22) Google Scholar, 3Cubero A. Crespo A. Hamzeh G. Cortes A. Rivas D. Aramendi J.I. Anomalous origin of right coronary artery from left coronary sinus-13 cases treated with the reimplantation technique.World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2017; 8: 315-320Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar, 4Gaillard M. Pontailler M. Danial P. de Bellaing A.M. Gaudin R. du Puy-Montbrun L. et al.Anomalous aortic origin of coronary arteries: an alternative to the unroofing strategy.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020; 58: 975-982Crossref PubMed Scopus (2) Google Scholar We have adopted this operation at out institution, and here we describe our technique. After median sternotomy and initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass, the anomalous RCA is identified and dissected up to its takeoff from its intramural portion (Figure 1 and Video 1), a length of 1.5-2 cm. The next step involves selection of the site of reimplantation, either high in the right coronary sinus of the aortic root or on the anterior surface of the proximal ascending aorta to avoid undue kinking; we recommend that this be done with the heart beating. At this time, marking of the RCA superior aspect is done to maintain proper orientation of this vessel and avoid rotation before implantation. Next, the heart is arrested with antegrade cold blood–based cardioplegia. A transverse aortotomy is performed 2 cm above the sinotubular junction. At this time the most proximal aspect of the RCA as it emerges from the aortic root is identified and transected. The residual stump is then oversewn with 6-0 Prolene. A neo-ostium is then created with an aortic punch (Figure 2 and Video 1). The proximal end of the RCA is now spatulated for a length of 7-8 mm. Construction of the proximal anastomosis starts by positioning the heel of the spatulated RCA toward the atrioventricular groove. This anastomosis is completed with 6-0 Prolene using a parachuting technique. This is followed by 2-layer closure of the aortotomy. A final injection of warm cardioplegia is given through the newly reimplanted RCA. During this injection, assessment of the RCA flow dynamics with Doppler ultrasound is performed. Finally, the heart is unclamped and deaired. Right ventricular function is cautiously examined by visual inspection and transesophageal echocardiography; the electrocardiogram tracing is also carefully monitored. Patients undergo nuclear stress testing and cardiac computed tomography angiography before discharge. They are then allowed to return to unrestricted physical activities at 6-8 weeks postoperatively. Here we share our recommendations to ensure optimal results following RCA reimplantation. Mobilization of the RCA for 1.5-2 cm is necessary to create a tension-free anastomosis and spares the most important proximal branches of the RCA. Because of their abnormal morphology, AAORCAs tend to be longer than normal RCAs and often need to be reimplanted higher in the right coronary sinus or in the very proximal ascending aorta.5Saleem S. Syed M. Elzanaty A.M. Nazir S. Changal K. Gul S. et al.Interarterial course of anomalous right coronary artery: role of symptoms and surgical outcomes.Coron Artery Dis. 2020; 31: 538-544Crossref PubMed Scopus (2) Google Scholar RCA kinking following reimplantation is a pitfall of this operation that can result from selecting a reimplantation site that is too low in the right coronary sinus. To avoid this complication, we recommend selecting the site of the proximal RCA anastomosis while the heart is beating and on cardiopulmonary bypass. Confirmation of correct positioning of the neo-ostium in relation to the aortic valve commissures is essential and is achieved most safely by performing an aortotomy to allow for direct visualization of the aortic valve. A meticulous construction of the anastomosis with the heel oriented toward the natural trajectory of the RCA is of paramount importance. This is achieved by using the atrioventricular groove as the reference point to orient the heel of this proximal anastomosis using a takeoff angle of ∼30°. Moreover, we recommend that the procedure be followed by careful intraoperative evaluation of RCA flow with Doppler, transesophageal echocardiography for right ventricular function, and electrocardiography for signs of ischemia. Before discharge, all patients should undergo nuclear stress imaging and a postoperative computed tomography angiogram to assess the new RCA course and patency. In summary, RCA reimplantation is a straightforward operation that restores normal anatomic and physiologic conditions and provides a solution for most morphological anomalies found in AAORCAs, including slit-like ostium, acute angle takeoff, and intramural and interarterial course. For this reason, every surgeon should become familiar with this approach for patients with AAORCA. The authors would like to thank Dr Lara Gharibeh for her help in making the central figure. https://www.jtcvstechniques.org/cms/asset/9dc01378-855a-4d54-9e90-a06f6b09c364/mmc1.mp4Loading ... Download .mp4 (276.91 MB) Help with .mp4 files Video 1Surgical technique for reimplantation of the anomalous origin of right coronary artery from the left coronary sinus. Video available at: https://www.jtcvs.org/article/S2666-2507(21)00117-6/fulltext. Download .jpg (.03 MB) Help with files Video 1Surgical technique for reimplantation of the anomalous origin of right coronary artery from the left coronary sinus. Video available at: https://www.jtcvs.org/article/S2666-2507(21)00117-6/fulltext.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,186
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,552

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,288
Écart entre enseignants0,272 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle