Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Taken by surprise, COVID-19 questions much of what we had left unquestioned. The past year certainly left its mark in publishing too, even in physiology, which to some seems far away from the COVID-19 battlefield. However, the contrary is true. Physiology gains even more importance in times of unexpected challenges to our health. Trained to rapidly grasp data and trends, physiologists combine their deep understanding of bodily functions to the benefit of us all. The download statistics of Acta Physiologica underscore the importance of physiology in these times. It is not uncommon that our articles are downloaded thousand fold. Yet, an editorial by Khedkar and Patzak1 being downloaded over seven thousand times in only weeks is more than remarkable. In an editorial, the authors can put forward theories and knowledge as expert opinions. In times of COVID, every day is essential and immediate guidance is required even if this means taking lower evidence levels into account. Often, it requires years before articles are downloaded so often. Last year provides many exceptions to this rule. In 2020, Gothie et al,2 Larsen et al,3 Lempesis et al,4 Lomo et a,l5 Miranda-Silva et al6 and Solagna et al7 published golden articles with far over 1000 downloads within the first months. Yet one editorial takes the cake. Can you imagine having your editorial downloaded over 20 000 times within less than 6 months? It is not impossible as you can see from the editorial by Steardo, Steardo Jr, Zorec and Verkhratsky.8 In their editorial, they provide cunning insight on COVID-19 and neurological disorders. The authors put forward that coronaviruses enter the CNS by intranasal inoculation using trans-synaptic pathways. Moreover, they outline why direct CNS infection in conjunction with generalized inflammation may trigger substantial neuroinflammatory responses as displayed by activation of microglia and reactive astrogliosis. Such neuroinflammation along with hypoxia could very well lead to neuropsychiatric developments and cognitive impairments seen in COVID-19 patients. Another interesting aspect is which countries download our articles most. For Acta Physiologica, the United States have a clear lead, followed by China, Great Britain, Canada and Germany. What is more, it seems that scientists read most during spring and autumn. In the midst of the first lockdown, that is, April 2020, Acta Physiologica enjoyed the most downloads ever. Can you imagine 45 000 downloads in only a month? Obviously, in 2020, Acta Physiologica was also taken by surprise. Nevertheless, the answers Acta Physiologica provided in response to COVID-19 hit the mark. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».