MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3130149272 · doi:10.1353/vpr.2020.0057

The European Illustrated Press and the Emergence of a Transnational Visual Culture of the News, 1842–1870 by Thomas Smits

2020· article· en· W3130149272 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Barbara Körte

Notice bibliographique

RevueVictorian periodicals review · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueVisual Culture and Art Theory
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNewspaperGlobeVisual cultureJournalismHistoryGermanMedia studiesArt historyArtSociologyVisual artsPsychologyArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The European Illustrated Press and the Emergence of a Transnational Visual Culture of the News, 1842–1870 by Thomas Smits Barbara Korte (bio) Thomas Smits, The European Illustrated Press and the Emergence of a Transnational Visual Culture of the News, 1842–1870 (London: Routledge 2020), pp. ix + 240, £96 hardcover, £29.59 e-book. This study of mid-nineteenth-century visual news culture is an eye-opener. Smits’s book reveals the complex entanglements of the European illustrated press during its heyday and the social importance it gained through [End Page 629] disseminating images around the world. People today are used to seeing the same news pictures all over the globe, even in real time. As Smits argues on the basis of an impressive amount of material, the origins of this global news culture do not lie in twentieth-century photographic journalism, as is often assumed. Rather, its origins are found in illustrated newspapers and their large-scale commercial and piratical exchange of wood-engraved images. This exchange was not limited to Europe but spread to the colonies and the United States. To date, studies of illustrated newspapers have tended to focus on three famous publications launched in the early 1840s: the pioneering Illustrated London News (1842), the French L’Illustration (1843), and the German Illustrirte Zeitung (1843). Smits inspects more than forty titles from different contexts, including small countries such as the Netherlands, where this book began as a doctoral thesis. He also crosses borders between disciplines, including history, media history, visual and cultural studies, and digital humanities. His investigations draw on current concepts and methods in periodicals studies, but his understanding of transnationality is inspired by the German historian Jürgen Osterhammel and refers to processes that take place in between national contexts and agencies. Such inbetweenness has been a blind spot in the history of illustrated newspapers, which have mainly been studied in their national contexts. Challenging this approach, Smits shows that the illustrated press was an essentially transnational phenomenon—not only regarding the traded pictures but also the reproduction technologies and commercial and personal networks on which the exchange of images depended. Smits does not ignore the national significance of nineteenth-century illustrated newspapers, but he offers a more nuanced analysis. For example, he demonstrates how publishers and editors often adapted images bought from a foreign source to their new national context by altering captions and occasionally even elements within the images themselves. Ultimately, Smits proposes shifting our focus on the role of periodicals, and media generally, in the production of identities “from representation, a close reading of content, to the different audiences that consumed media” (222). The four main chapters of his book set standards for this kind of approach. Each offers data-rich analyses derived from clever methodical designs. Smits grants that transnational research on a grand scale is contingent on the digital turn and how digitization enables keyword searches across national archives. He is, however, aware of the pitfalls of the digital archive and includes undigitized material that is highly informative for his study, notably Cassell’s Illustrated Family Paper. The first chapter traces the urban, national, and international audiences of the three famous European papers mentioned above. Smits used the British Newspaper Archive and similar digital collections to calculate the dissemination of titles from [End Page 630] datasets including advertisements, postage rates, subscribers’ letters, or evidence of censorship. A case study zooms in on the Illustrated London News and its attempt to recruit international readers during the Great Exhibition. With equal diligence, the second chapter reveals the procedures of the image trade and its networks, such as the one formed around Henry Vizetelly. As representative of the Illustrated London News in Paris, Vizetelly became “the essential link between the British and French engraving trade in the 1860s and early 1870s” (89). Smits’s data allow him to distinguish three stages of the trade: at first, the Illustrated London News was the major image provider; after 1850 major French and German papers established themselves in the market; and in the 1860s the new penny illustrated newspapers kept the trade alive because they depended on acquiring old images cheaply. The two subsequent...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,024
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,049

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,005
Communication savante0,0060,006
Science ouverte0,0000,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0150,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,024
Tête enseignante GPT0,255
Écart entre enseignants0,230 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueVictorian periodicals reviewMême sujetVisual Culture and Art TheoryTravaux en français237 207