MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3131700906 · doi:10.1353/nin.2019.0034

The Phoebe, Me, and the Giants

2019· article· en· W3131700906 sur OpenAlex
Howard J. De Nike

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

venuePublié dans une revue dont le pays d'attache est le Canada.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueNine · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueWeb and Library Services
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMutinyChampionshipStadiumLeagueArt historyAdvertisingHistoryArtMedia studiesEngineeringVisual artsArchaeologySociologyAstronomy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Phoebe, Me, and the Giants Howard J. De Nike (bio) Unexpectedly, the Muni streetcar made short work of delivering me to AT&T Park. I had an extra forty-five minutes before my rendezvous with the benefactor holding my ticket to Game 3 of the 2010 National League Championship Series between the San Francisco Giants and the Philadelphia Phillies. Strolling to the rear of the stadium I found a bench ideal for watching people make their way to various stadium entrances. The location also marks the edge of a small-boat marina between the park and San Francisco Bay. Brilliant sunlight flooded the noon hour bustle. The back approach to the field drew an odd assortment of fans—the ones who drink their wine without bother of glassware, or inhale medicinal THC. I made myself comfortable. The Giants had split the previous two games on the East Coast, and were looking forward to the first of three games on the home field. Roy Halladay, the Phillies’ best pitcher, had failed to deliver a win at home. The Giants had high hopes they could exploit the advantage of playing the next three in front of their own fans. At such moments it’s inevitable for fans to look for omens, auguries, presentiments of future success. (Often the sign is only recognized in retrospect; for instance, a shirt worn during a win is donned for the next game, unlaundered.) But here I’m talking about a true hieromancy, an opening to an occult source of information, a divine scoop—one that reveals good fortune, authoritatively, beforehand. So my senses were alert. I am a lifelong birdwatcher, a trait nurtured ever since three out of my first four grammar school teachers (in a small Salinas Valley town) were members of the Audubon Society. When I see a feathered creature on the wing, I make a mental note. If it’s something unusual I make two mental notes. While on the walkway behind AT&T that day observing fans clad in orange and black, the team colors, I saw a small dark bird fly from beneath the promenade up into the rigging of one of the unattended sailboats. A moment passed before I was certain: it was a black phoebe (Sayornis nigricans). Sighting this six-inch member of the flycatcher family in the city would be unusual (outside of a few places—as we shall see). But having one [End Page 158] appear at the waterfront came as a complete surprise. As the designation suggests, flying insects are the exclusive fare of the species. Not that the rim of San Francisco Bay is without insects, but phoebes normally reside in open spaces, close to woods or glades. One may appear near water, but not salt water. Since a black phoebe displays one of the Giants’ team colors, perhaps it was AN OMEN. (NLCS GAME THREE: Matt Cain pitches a shutout; Giants beat Phillies 3–0, and take a 2–1 lead.) The next day, Wednesday October 20, was my weekly golf date at Indian Valley Golf Course. The Giants would be playing the next NLCS game that night, again at AT&T Park. I wasn’t thinking particularly about the previous encounter with a black phoebe, until on the green for the fifteenth hole, set on an elevated crest overlooking several other holes, a phoebe abruptly materialized. It appeared first on a rock outcropping, then flitted to a dwarfish tree. Like many types of flycatchers, a black phoebe (always solitary) will position itself advantageously at a spot where it can dart into the air, snatch an insect on the wing, even making an airborne U-turn, and then return to its original perch. That basically describes the maneuvers of this one. He hung around for several minutes, while the foursome busied itself lining up putts. Myself, I made a mental note. (Indian Valley, located in Marin County, is about as bucolic a golf course as one can imagine. But until that Wednesday, I can’t say I recall seeing a black phoebe hanging around a green.) (NLCS GAME FOUR: Giants overcome Phillies by score of 6–5; Juan Uribe hits sensational ninth inning...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,896
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,148

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,002
Tête enseignante GPT0,168
Écart entre enseignants0,166 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNineMême sujetWeb and Library ServicesTravaux en français237 207