MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3131700906 · doi:10.1353/nin.2019.0034

The Phoebe, Me, and the Giants

2019· article· en· W3131700906 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Howard J. De Nike

Notice bibliographique

RevueNine · 2019
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueWeb and Library Services
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMutinyChampionshipStadiumLeagueArt historyAdvertisingHistoryArtMedia studiesEngineeringVisual artsArchaeologySociologyAstronomy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Phoebe, Me, and the Giants Howard J. De Nike (bio) Unexpectedly, the Muni streetcar made short work of delivering me to AT&T Park. I had an extra forty-five minutes before my rendezvous with the benefactor holding my ticket to Game 3 of the 2010 National League Championship Series between the San Francisco Giants and the Philadelphia Phillies. Strolling to the rear of the stadium I found a bench ideal for watching people make their way to various stadium entrances. The location also marks the edge of a small-boat marina between the park and San Francisco Bay. Brilliant sunlight flooded the noon hour bustle. The back approach to the field drew an odd assortment of fans—the ones who drink their wine without bother of glassware, or inhale medicinal THC. I made myself comfortable. The Giants had split the previous two games on the East Coast, and were looking forward to the first of three games on the home field. Roy Halladay, the Phillies’ best pitcher, had failed to deliver a win at home. The Giants had high hopes they could exploit the advantage of playing the next three in front of their own fans. At such moments it’s inevitable for fans to look for omens, auguries, presentiments of future success. (Often the sign is only recognized in retrospect; for instance, a shirt worn during a win is donned for the next game, unlaundered.) But here I’m talking about a true hieromancy, an opening to an occult source of information, a divine scoop—one that reveals good fortune, authoritatively, beforehand. So my senses were alert. I am a lifelong birdwatcher, a trait nurtured ever since three out of my first four grammar school teachers (in a small Salinas Valley town) were members of the Audubon Society. When I see a feathered creature on the wing, I make a mental note. If it’s something unusual I make two mental notes. While on the walkway behind AT&T that day observing fans clad in orange and black, the team colors, I saw a small dark bird fly from beneath the promenade up into the rigging of one of the unattended sailboats. A moment passed before I was certain: it was a black phoebe (Sayornis nigricans). Sighting this six-inch member of the flycatcher family in the city would be unusual (outside of a few places—as we shall see). But having one [End Page 158] appear at the waterfront came as a complete surprise. As the designation suggests, flying insects are the exclusive fare of the species. Not that the rim of San Francisco Bay is without insects, but phoebes normally reside in open spaces, close to woods or glades. One may appear near water, but not salt water. Since a black phoebe displays one of the Giants’ team colors, perhaps it was AN OMEN. (NLCS GAME THREE: Matt Cain pitches a shutout; Giants beat Phillies 3–0, and take a 2–1 lead.) The next day, Wednesday October 20, was my weekly golf date at Indian Valley Golf Course. The Giants would be playing the next NLCS game that night, again at AT&T Park. I wasn’t thinking particularly about the previous encounter with a black phoebe, until on the green for the fifteenth hole, set on an elevated crest overlooking several other holes, a phoebe abruptly materialized. It appeared first on a rock outcropping, then flitted to a dwarfish tree. Like many types of flycatchers, a black phoebe (always solitary) will position itself advantageously at a spot where it can dart into the air, snatch an insect on the wing, even making an airborne U-turn, and then return to its original perch. That basically describes the maneuvers of this one. He hung around for several minutes, while the foursome busied itself lining up putts. Myself, I made a mental note. (Indian Valley, located in Marin County, is about as bucolic a golf course as one can imagine. But until that Wednesday, I can’t say I recall seeing a black phoebe hanging around a green.) (NLCS GAME FOUR: Giants overcome Phillies by score of 6–5; Juan Uribe hits sensational ninth inning...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,102
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,340

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,003
Communication savante0,0080,004
Science ouverte0,0010,006
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,008
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1020,044

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,002
Tête enseignante GPT0,168
Écart entre enseignants0,166 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2019
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNineMême sujetWeb and Library ServicesTravaux en français237 207