MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3131724246 · doi:10.1016/j.ekir.2021.02.007

Evaluation of the Reproductive Care Provided to Adolescent Patients in Nephrology Clinics: A Pediatric Nephrology Research Consortium Study

2021· article· en· W3131724246 sur OpenAlexaff
Tetyana L. Vasylyeva, Shyanne Page-Hefley, Salem Almaani, Isabelle Ayoub, Abigail Batson, Michelle Hladunewich, Noel Howard, Hilda Fernández, Michelle M. O’Shaughnessy, Monica L. Reynolds, Shikha Wadhwani, Jarcy Zee, William E. Smoyer, Scott E. Wenderfer, Katherine Twombley

Notice bibliographique

RevueKidney International Reports · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePregnancy and Medication Impact
Établissements canadiensSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineKidney diseaseNephrologyFamily medicinePregnancyReproductive healthInternal medicinePopulationEnvironmental health

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Approximately 20 million of the 333 million persons living in the United States are adolescent females.1Projected 5-year age groups and sex composition: Main projections series for the United States, 2017-2060. US Census Bureau, Washington, DC2017Google Scholar However, studies examining the reproductive care provided to adolescent females with kidney disease are scarce. Adolescents with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at a critical transition phase, and many issues arising during adolescence can directly or indirectly affect renal and reproductive outcomes,2Gerson A.C. Riley A. Fivush B.A. et al.Assessing health status and health care utilization in adolescents with chronic kidney disease.J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005; 16: 1427-1432Crossref PubMed Scopus (50) Google Scholar,3Xiao N. Stolfia A. Malatesta-Muncher R. et al.Risk behaviors in teens with chronic kidney disease: a study from the Midwest Pediatric Nephrology Consortium.Int J Nephrol. 2019; 2019: 7828406Crossref PubMed Scopus (4) Google Scholar including the effect of hormonal contraception on kidney physiology, a higher frequency of menstrual irregularities in patients with CKD, the potential for teratogenicity from kidney disease medications, and the need for preconception counseling about the risks of pregnancy. Despite these needs, confidence levels related to women’s health topics among nephrologists with patients with CKD appear to be low. In a recent study, >65% of surveyed nephrologists treating adult women with CKD lacked confidence managing women’s health issues including menopause and pregnancy. Interestingly, 89% felt that opportunities for improving competency in these areas were needed.4Hendren E.M. Reynolds M.L. Mariani L.H. et al.Confidence in women’s health: a cross border survey of adult nephrologists.J Clin Med. 2019; 8: 176Crossref Scopus (13) Google Scholar However, no similar study has been conducted among nephrologists managing adolescent females with CKD. Therefore, we sought to describe current practices among nephrologists in managing women’s health issues in adolescents with CKD, including confidence levels in providing this type of care. We circulated 305 surveys and received 86 responses. Eleven incomplete responses were excluded, resulting in 75 complete responses available for analysis (Table 1). The most common age group of the providers was 41 to 50 years, and 65% of providers were women. Ninety-eight percent were practicing in the United States, and 88% practiced solely in an academic/university setting. Ninety-three percent reported spending at least 25% of their time in clinical care. Pediatric nephrologists comprised 94.9% of the providers, with the remaining 5% being adult nephrologists. Most (75%) reported that adolescents comprised >25% of their patient population, and 24% reported that they comprised >75% of their practice (Table 1).Table 1Characteristics of survey respondents (N = 75)Demographic characteristicsPercentage of providersSexMale32Female65.3Prefer not to answer2.7Age (yr)30–4030.641–503651–6016.3>6010.6Prefer not to answer6.5Current location of practiceUnited States of America98.7Puerto Rico1.3Current practice settingAcademic/university88Hybrid8Other4Scope of practicePediatric nephrology94.9Adult nephrology5.1Percentage time dedicated to clinical care0%–24%6.725%–49%16.050%–74%36.075%–100%41.3Percentage of patient population that is adolescent0%–24%1225%–49%6450%–75%2475%–100%0Received formal training in either of these areas?Obstetric nephrology1.3Women’s health0Neither98.7 Open table in a new tab Only 1 provider received formal training in obstetric nephrology (with a focus on renal function during pregnancy) during their nephrology training (Table 1). When asked who cared for their adolescent patients if they became pregnant, 65% referred them to adult nephrologists. None of the providers reported training specific to women’s health. We noted that 16.6% of providers never/rarely documented age at menarche, and 34.7% never/rarely documented the date of the patient’s last menstrual period. An alarming 29.5% of providers never/rarely documented patient sexual activity, 74.7% never/rarely documented the number of sexual partners, and 38.1% never/rarely documented sexually transmitted infection history (Table 2). Furthermore, 33.8% never/rarely documented pregnancy history, and 45.8% never/rarely documented history of pregnancy loss/termination (Table 2).Table 2Frequency of documentation (% of providers) in patient charts about sexual and menstrual health and fertility desire/risksHow often do you document each of the following items for your adolescent patients?NeverRarelySometimesOftenAlwaysAge at menarche4.212.533.337.512.5Pregnancy history9.624.214.514.537History of pregnancy termination/loss18.627.215.213.625.4Date of last menstrual period11.324.032.419.812.7Prior contraceptive use7.114.347.124.35.7Prior sexual activity7.022.543.721.15.6Sexual partner preference19.73829.69.92.8Number of sexual partners26.847.918.32.84.2History of sexually transmitted infections9.928.236.617.08.5 Open table in a new tab More than 92% of providers reported always/often discussing the teratogenic potential of certain medications used for the treatment of CKD (angiotensin II receptor blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and/or mycophenolate mofetil). However, 36.9% of providers never/rarely documented a negative pregnancy test before prescribing these medications (Table 3). Most (92.6%) of the providers discussed infertility risks with their patients before prescribing cyclophosphamide, and most discussed fertility-preserving options. However, only 41.3% always/often talked with patients about their desires for future pregnancy (Table 3).Table 3Frequency of discussion and/or documentation of fertility-preserving options and fetotoxicity of commonly prescribed renal drugs (% of providers)How often do you document each of the following items for your adolescent patients?NeverRarelySometimesOftenAlwaysDocumentation of a discussion on the risk of fetotoxicity with ACEis/ARBs or mycophenolate use0.00.06.916.776.3Document a negative pregnancy test before starting a fetotoxic medication9.927.016.918.328.2Discuss the risk of infertility with cyclophosphamide001.55.992.6Discuss the fertility-preserving options (hormonal ovarian suppression and oocyte cryopreservation) with exposure to cyclophosphamide4.57.613.628.845.5Discussion on patient’s desire for future pregnancy1.420.037.127.114.2ACEis, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; ARBs, angiotensin II receptor blockers. Open table in a new tab ACEis, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; ARBs, angiotensin II receptor blockers. A majority of providers were not at all confident/somewhat confident in managing menstrual disorders (87.5%). Only 26.4% were very confident/confident discussing fertility preservation. Only 38.9% were very confident/confident discussing fetal outcomes with pregnancy in CKD. However, 83.3% were very confident/confident discussing the fetotoxicity of immunosuppressants (Figure 1). Overall, 62.5% of providers were very confident/confident discussing the risks and benefits of contraceptives. However, only 44.4% were confident in discussing oral contraceptives, whereas 60.6% were comfortable discussing barrier methods (60.6%). Furthermore, 30.9% of providers were uncomfortable with discussing long-acting reversible contraceptives, including intrauterine devices, implants, and injectables (Figure 2). This survey provides insights into the confidence levels of nephrologists in managing women’s health issues in adolescent female patients with CKD. Although most providers cared for female adolescents, an overwhelming majority denied having received any formal training in topics pertaining to women’s health. Together, our findings support those from prior studies among adult patients showing low physician confidence and insufficient training on topics concerning women’s health5Berns J.S. A survey-based evaluation of self-perceived competency after nephrology fellowship training.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010; 5: 490-496Crossref PubMed Scopus (105) Google Scholar, 6Fox H.B. McManus M.A. Klein J.D. et al.Adolescent medicine training in pediatric residency programs.Pediatrics. 2010; 125: 165-172Crossref PubMed Scopus (52) Google Scholar, 7Hellerstedt W.L. Smith A.E. Shew M.L. Resnick M.D. Perceived knowledge and training needs in adolescent pregnancy prevention: results from a multidisciplinary survey.Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000; 154: 679-684Crossref PubMed Scopus (14) Google Scholar, 8Spencer A.L. Kern L.M. Primary care program director’s perceptions of women’s health education: a gap in graduate medical education persists.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2008; 17: 549-556Crossref PubMed Scopus (18) Google Scholar, 9Dehlendorf C. Levy K. Ruskin R. Steinauer J. Health care providers’ knowledge about contraceptive evidence: a barrier to quality family planning care?.Contraception. 2010; 81: 292-298Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (106) Google Scholar,S1,S2 and highlight the need for enhanced training for nephrologists regarding women’s health issues. We observed that within the last year, all providers had counseled adolescents of childbearing age with CKD about contraception, although only 10% were prescribing contraceptives. Furthermore, many providers lacked confidence in discussing individual contraceptive options with adolescents. One US study found that 50% of pediatricians advised abstinence as the primary form of birth control in their adolescent patients.S3–S5 Another study found that only two-thirds of adolescent girls received contraceptive education in schools, indicating an educational void that could be filled by physicians.S4,S6,S21 In other studies, physicians reported receiving most of their information on contraception from colleagues and conferences (56%), medical journals (40%), and websites (33%), rather than through formal training. Moreover, those that lacked knowledge about different forms of contraception were less likely to prescribe them to adolescents.S4,S6 We also noted that an average of 31.9% of providers were not comfortable talking with adolescents about long-acting reversible contraceptives. However, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology both recommend long-acting reversible contraceptives as first-line contraception for adolescent females because these have been deemed safe for their use for pregnancy prevention and dysmenorrhea.S7,S8 Targeted education for nephrologists about the benefits and practicalities of long-acting reversible contraceptives might help to address this knowledge gap, thus minimizing the risk for unplanned pregnancy while avoiding potential side effects from estrogen-based oral contraceptives.9Dehlendorf C. Levy K. Ruskin R. Steinauer J. Health care providers’ knowledge about contraceptive evidence: a barrier to quality family planning care?.Contraception. 2010; 81: 292-298Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (106) Google Scholar,S9–S13 We found that nephrology providers also infrequently documented the details of adolescent menstrual cycles. This agrees with prior studies, which showed that there are inconsistencies in menstrual cycle documentation in pediatric clinics across the United States.S14–S16 Because the American Academy of Pediatrics classifies the menstrual cycle as a vital sign,S14 documentation of the last menstrual period in adolescents should be a standard clinical practice and should be included in all templates developed for electronic medical records. Documentation of the menstrual cycle can provide knowledge of overall health and can also allow physicians to introduce contraceptives. Irregular menstrual cycles affect approximately 25% of adolescent females and can impact quality of life and, therefore, can be addressed by physicians by prescribing contraceptives for menstrual irregularity.S17,S18 Discussing contraceptive use is especially important in nephrology clinics because pregnancy in patients with CKD can be risky and requires close observation throughout the pregnancy.S19,S20 It is important for nephrologists not to assume that another provider has addressed menstrual issues in their CKD. Knowledge of patients’ goals in relation to pregnancy and fertility is an integral part of discussions with adolescent CKD patients, especially given their impending transition to adulthood. We observed that 92.6% of providers discussed potential infertility with the use of cyclophosphamide,76% discussed fetotoxicity of angiotensin II receptor blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and 50% were confident discussing fertility preservation in patients with CKD. However, pregnancy history and desires for future pregnancy were infrequently documented, which is worrying because multiple studies have identified prepregnancy planning as a key to optimizing maternal and fetal outcomes.4Hendren E.M. Reynolds M.L. Mariani L.H. et al.Confidence in women’s health: a cross border survey of adult nephrologists.J Clin Med. 2019; 8: 176Crossref Scopus (13) Google Scholar,S19,S20 These findings are similar to a survey of adult nephrologists in which only half of the providers documented pregnancy history.4Hendren E.M. Reynolds M.L. Mariani L.H. et al.Confidence in women’s health: a cross border survey of adult nephrologists.J Clin Med. 2019; 8: 176Crossref Scopus (13) Google Scholar Given that the vast majority of nephrologists surveyed in our study transferred the care of their adolescent CKD patients to an adult nephrologist once they became pregnant, we wonder whether this lack of clinical exposure (in addition to the lack of formal training) compounds the poor confidence of nephrologists in counseling adolescents with CKD about pregnancy risks. This observation is concerning because the transition of care in such pregnant patients is often very abrupt at a time when they are dealing with the significant stress of an adolescent pregnancy. In summary, nephrologists who care for female adolescent patients are very well positioned to address these patients’ emerging fertility and reproductive needs and/or problems. However, we identified key elements of adolescents’ menstrual, sexual, and reproductive histories that were only infrequently documented by nephrologists and that the providers lack confidence prescribing contraception, counseling about pregnancy risks, and managing pregnancy in adolescent patients with CKD. More formal training in women’s health and obstetric nephrology during fellowships and greater clinical exposure to pregnant adolescents and women would likely improve provider competence and confidence in the future, thus enabling nephrologists to better care for female adolescents with CKD and to more safely transition them into adulthood.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,047
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,043
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,962

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,047
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,070
Tête enseignante GPT0,427
Écart entre enseignants0,357 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations7
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueKidney International ReportsMême sujetPregnancy and Medication ImpactTravaux en français237 207