MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W313245509

Institutional VVM Statements on Websites

2011· article· en· W313245509 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wm. Berry Calder

Notice bibliographique

RevueMichigan Community College journal · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueOrganizational Strategy and Culture
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMandateStakeholderInstitutionVariety (cybernetics)Public relationsMission statementOrganizational chartOrder (exchange)Service (business)BusinessMarketingPolitical scienceManagementComputer scienceEconomicsLaw
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Educational leaders rely on compelling statements of institutional beliefs, strategic direction, and purpose (i.e., values, vision, and mission statements or VVM statements) as the three major pillars by which to launch new program/service initiatives, to enhance academic and administrative operations, and to chart sustainable options in building future institutional capacity for change. This study surveyed the various VVM statements found on an institution's website. Through this primary information source those statements identified were assessed as to their accuracy against established VVM definitions, and their rate of occurrence was also noted. The case is put forward that an institution that has developed and articulated informative VVM statements can assist its constituent groups in having greater confidence in its strategic direction (vision) as well as having an unambiguous sense of purpose (mission) as clearly defined by its common values. ********** Powerful statements around an institution's values, strategic direction, and mission can have a dramatic effect on what an institution actually does, what actions it takes, and based upon those actions what intentions can be inferred. Colleges and technical institutes have long maintained a broad mandate in terms of the educational programs offered to learners, their connection to business and industry in order to important training initiatives, and the variety of support services for diverse student groups whom they serve. Not long ago, program growth and operational expansion were the main driving forces as institutions across the country responded to the education and training needs of various stakeholder groups. Basically, it was a develop and deliver philosophy for educational institutions. However, today fiscal issues and enrolment challenges have now forced colleges and technical institutes to seriously reconsider the outdated working philosophy of being things to all people and to re-examine their beliefs, strategic direction, and sense of purpose, which is their values, vision, and mission. An institution needs to openly and clearly articulate its values, vision, and mission (Calder, 2007). These cogent statements should be highly visible for all to read and embrace (Bart, 2001). An institution's values are a basis for any strategic planning process and assist in the way an institution conducts its educational business. The vision, on the other hand, while an ideal, provides an answer to the question, What does success look like? And the educational mission, which is the most misunderstood statement of purpose, addresses the results of an institution's work for its customers (e.g., learners, government). Barr (2000) says, A mission statement helps those who work at, teach at, contemplate attending, and support an institution, understand what the institution is attempting to accomplish (p. 26). All too often the mission is written in such a way that reflects an institution's activities or actions, like the acquiring of new equipment, facilities, or forging new partnerships rather than the outcomes for the customers (Calder, 2002). One way to collect data on institutional VVM statements is to see how they are communicated to various stakeholders via the Internet, which is a contemporary and very convenient medium for this expressed purpose. The belief that VVM statements need to be pervasive throughout an organization supports their strategic placement on an institution's website. Study Design This study is an observational and evaluative design which came about as an applied research interest in identifying established VVM statements from colleges and institutes across Canada as recorded from their websites and how these statements met their articulated definitions as noted by writers in the field. All institutions in this study are members of a national postsecondary education association (Association of Canadian Community Colleges). …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,009
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,064
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,019
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,063

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0090,064
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0060,007
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0050,006
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0190,008

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,059
Tête enseignante GPT0,251
Écart entre enseignants0,192 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations10
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMichigan Community College journalMême sujetOrganizational Strategy and CultureTravaux en français237 207