Abstract PS1-61: Clinical and patient reported outcomes in oncoplastic breast conservation surgery from a single surgeon's practice in a busy community hospital in Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction: Oncoplastic breast surgery combines oncologic partial mastectomy with ipsilateral defect repair using volume displacement and volume replacement techniques with contralateral symmetrising surgery as appropriate. Oncoplastic surgery aims to maintain quality of life by pre-empting and mitigating against breast asymmetry whilst not compromising oncological effectiveness. Although growing in popularity in North America, many patients still do not have access to these techniques which usually involve longer operation times and require a surgeon with specialized oncoplastic training. This study demonstrates the implementation of an effective oncoplastic surgical practice in a community hospital within Canada and shows low rates of peri-operative complications as well as high levels of patient-reported outcome measures. Methods:A retrospective chart review of consecutive patients diagnosed with Stage 0-3 breast cancer treated with level I and level II oncoplastic techniques by a single breast surgeon was undertaken. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, procedure types, and clinical outcomes were collected. Patient satisfaction was assessed with the Breast-Q questionnaire administered pre-operatively as well as 3 months and 9 months post-operatively. Results:Oncoplastic breast conservation surgery was performed in 340 patients over a 31 month period from 2017-2019. The average size of breast lesion was 1.8 cm with 96 patients having lesions 2-5 cm in size, and 10 patients having tumours >5cm. Thirty (8.8%) patients experienced a complication requiring intervention. Margin revisions were required in 21.8% of patients which reduced to 18% after the implementation of the new margin consensus guidelines. The completion mastectomy rate was 4.7%. Contralateral symmetrizing procedures were performed in 31 (9.1%) of patients by the surgeon performing the patient's breast conservation surgery. Breast Q scores increased across breast satisfaction, process of care, psychosocial, physical, and sexual satisfaction domains post-operatively. Conclusion:This study demonstrates the feasibility of an oncoplastic breast surgery practice in a busy community hospital in Canada. This adds to the growing body of North American data on the clinical and oncological safety of these techniques and introduces the idea of collecting patient-reported outcome measures within a Canadian population. We hope that this will serve to aid in the recruitment of oncoplastic-trained surgeons to both teaching and community hospitals and enable these techniques to become the standard of care in North America. Citation Format: Ashley DiPasquale, Zofia Prus-Czarnecka, Lindsay Delmar, Lashan Peiris. Clinical and patient reported outcomes in oncoplastic breast conservation surgery from a single surgeon's practice in a busy community hospital in Canada [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-61.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».