Population Coding of Natural Electrosensory Stimuli by Midbrain Neurons
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Natural stimuli display spatiotemporal characteristics that typically vary over orders of magnitude, and their encoding by sensory neurons remains poorly understood. We investigated population coding of highly heterogeneous natural electrocommunication stimuli in Apteronotus leptorhynchus of either sex. Neuronal activities were positively correlated with one another in the absence of stimulation, and correlation magnitude decayed with increasing distance between recording sites. Under stimulation, we found that correlations between trial-averaged neuronal responses (i.e., signal correlations) were positive and higher in magnitude for neurons located close to another, but that correlations between the trial-to-trial variability (i.e., noise correlations) were independent of physical distance. Overall, signal and noise correlations were independent of stimulus waveform as well as of one another. To investigate how neuronal populations encoded natural electrocommunication stimuli, we considered a nonlinear decoder for which the activities were combined. Decoding performance was best for a timescale of 6 ms, indicating that midbrain neurons transmit information via precise spike timing. A simple summation of neuronal activities (equally weighted sum) revealed that noise correlations limited decoding performance by introducing redundancy. Using an evolution algorithm to optimize performance when considering instead unequally weighted sums of neuronal activities revealed much greater performance values, indicating that midbrain neuron populations transmit information that reliably enable discrimination between different stimulus waveforms. Interestingly, we found that different weight combinations gave rise to similar discriminability, suggesting robustness. Our results have important implications for understanding how natural stimuli are integrated by downstream brain areas to give rise to behavioral responses. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT We show that midbrain electrosensory neurons display correlations between their activities and that these can significantly impact performance of decoders. While noise correlations limited discrimination performance by introducing redundancy, considering unequally weighted sums of neuronal activities gave rise to much improved performance and mitigated the deleterious effects of noise correlations. Further analysis revealed that increased discriminability was achieved by making trial-averaged responses more separable, as well as by reducing trial-to-trial variability by eliminating noise correlations. We further found that multiple combinations of weights could give rise to similar discrimination performances, which suggests that such combinatorial codes could be achieved in the brain. We conclude that the activities of midbrain neuronal populations can be used to reliably discriminate between highly heterogeneous stimulus waveforms.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».