A18 DIETARY PREDICTORS OF BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY IN CROHN’S DISEASE: A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) often seek advice on optimizing their diet to reduce gut inflammation. The relationship between dietary patterns, major food groups and individual nutrients, with disease activity in Crohn’s disease (CD) is incompletely understood and warrants further investigation. Aims 1.To determine whether a diversified (DD) or nondiversified (NDD) dietary pattern is related to biological activity in CD (BACD) in long-term follow up. 2.To determine if specific foods or nutrients are associated with increased BACD. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, forty-six CD patients (52% male) in remission completed 3-day food records between 2015–2017 for a 3-month intervention study and were classified as DD or NDD. Remission was defined by a Harvey Bradshaw Index <5 and no endoscopic ulcerations within 6 months of baseline data collection. Patients were classified as NDD if dietary fibre was ≤15 g/day or total fruit/vegetable servings ≤3/week, and if they consumed ≥3 servings/week of red and processed meat. Patients were otherwise defined as DD. A retrospective chart review captured BACD data. BACD was defined as one of either fecal calprotectin (FCP) ≥250 ug/g, hospitalization for CD flare, bowel resection for active CD, biologic dose escalation/switch due to non-response (not therapeutic drug monitoring), corticosteroid use, endoscopic evidence of apthous or large ulcers, or active disease on contrast enhanced ultrasound or magnetic resonance enterography. Machine learning methods with random forest prediction models assessed if diet composition was associated with BACD followed by univariate Mann-Whitney tests to compare differences between high and low disease activity. Results Sixteen patients (35%) had BACD during the mean 42 month follow up (31–54 months,SD ± 6.6). See Table 1 for additional demographics. Based on the random forest prediction model, both vitamins and minerals, food groups and Mediterranean diet cut-points could predict disease activity responses (ROC-AUC = 0.68 and 0.75, respectively). For these models, baseline intake of vitamins E, D, B1, and C and leafy greens, and fruit intake were the most important predictors of BACD. For the univariate analysis, the high disease group had lower intakes of fiber, vitamin E, and C (p = 0.047, 0.066, and 0.09, respectively). A higher proportion of patients consumed a NDD with BACD compared to those without BACD (50% vs. 23.3%, p=0.07). Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first study to assess if dietary patterns, foods and nutrients are able to predict disease activity over a mean 42 month follow up. Further research into the dietary determinants of BACD in CD is warranted. With higher baseline FCP observed in the BACD, multivariate analyses to assess the independent effect of diet to predict BACD is required. Funding Agencies Litwin IBD Pioneers Foundation, Alberta’s Collaboration of Excellence for Nutrition in Digestive Diseases (Ascend)
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».