L'état des fédérations, Tome 1: l'unité dans la diversité par Christophe Parent
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: L'état des fédérations, Tome 1: l'unité dans la diversité par Christophe Parent Gavin Meyer Furrey Parent, Christophe. L'état des fédérations, Tome 1: l'unité dans la diversité. PU du Québec, 2019. ISBN 978-2-7605-5130-5. Pp. 256. Parent's first of two volumes on federal theory and multi-nationality joins the ranks of those troubled by the uniformizing nature of federal pacts that were intended to preserve cultural and political diversity. The first section highlights the "law of centralization" and explores the plentiful attempts to define the elusive and stretched federal concept. From Alexis de Tocqueville, who insisted on the importance of cultural homogeneity for a federation's success, to James Bryce, who saw federalism as the transitory step to a government's unity, Parent reviews the thought feeding federal ambitions prior to the twentieth century, which focused on centrifugal and centripetal tendencies of the model. The models of monarchy and republicanism are juxtaposed in the following section, with the resulting assertion that it was believed impossible to conciliate distinct political cultures within a federal model. Montesquieu's "republic of republics" is presented to assert the importance of political homogeneity, leading to the discussion of cultural homogeneity as a precondition of federalism. Tocqueville and Mill re-enter the dialogue, mobilizing observations derived from the American model suggesting that effective ties between individuals speaking the same language were essential for realizing a republic's general public opinion. The thought of British theorist James Bryce is mobilized to contrast this republican approach, adding that if the absence of cohesive cultural identity may hurt a union, its presence by no means guarantees its survival. Parent summarizes this dialogue by isolating the function of homogeneity in federal theory, which he identifies as a sociological response to what is fundamentally a legal aporia… "moins une donnée culturaliste qu'une clause de sauvegarde" (106). Homogeneity is thus pursued with one goal: to avoid conflicts over sovereignty. Chapter 3 reviews the doctrinal origins of a federation of peoples. The postwar period of Europe dominates this review, as this period incarnated a paroxysm of will to avoid conflict. Kenneth Wheare is prominent in this discussion for his assertion that a desire to unify is more important than nationality for a precondition to federalism. Oliver Beaud joins this perspective, underlining the contractual origins of federalism as a pact or an institution. Chapter 4 reveals the thesis of Parent's work, denouncing functional presuppositions of federalism for their ignorance of the intrinsic richness of the essence of the concept. Parent detaches the Federation from the State, both for the Federation and for the federated. He further stresses that nationalization of political life of the Federation automatically undercuts the federal principle. This non-state and anti-nation-state understanding of federalism affirms the Federation as a pluralist legal order, in which the depository of power are not the demos, but the demoi (241). Thus Parent does not agree that federalism is an individualistic principle, which might favor monopolizing norms. He asserts that its vocation is in fact a form of cultural isomorphism. Parent offers a rich theoretical review and [End Page 256] analysis of the state of federalism, with blatant willingness to resist the State as the political organizer of diverse societies. Gavin Meyer Furrey Université de Montréal (QC), Canada Copyright © 2021 American Association of Teachers of French
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».