Local prostate radiotherapy in metastatic prostate cancer and symptomatic local events.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
111 Background: Local prostate radiotherapy (LPRT) is associated with improved overall survival in patients with low metastatic burden (MB) and is now standard of care. However, the role of LPRT in reducing symptomatic local events (SLE) in metastatic prostate cancer (MPC) remains unclear and requires long-term follow-up. The purpose of this study was two-fold: i) identify the risk factors associated with SLE, and ii) evaluate the association between LPRT and SLE in MPC. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, population-based cohort study of patients diagnosed with initial MPC between 2005 and 2016. Patients were identified through the Alberta Cancer Registry and patient, tumour, and treatment characteristics were collected by chart review. Data were linked to physician billing claims between 2004 and 2017 for diagnostic or therapeutic procedures potentially related to genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) SLE including percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) and ureteric stent insertion (USI), cystoscopy, TURP, TURBT, colonoscopy and proctosigmoidoscopy. Both Andersen-Gill recurrent event and multivariable Cox regression time to first event analyses were conducted to evaluate the effect of LPRT on the occurrence of these procedures. Patients who underwent radical prostatectomy were excluded. LPRT was defined as 40 Gy or higher total dose to the prostate within one year of diagnosis. Patients with a SLE occurring after diagnosis but prior to LPRT were allocated to the control group. MB was defined as per STAMPEDE. Covariates for both models included MB, age at diagnosis, PSA at diagnosis, clinical T- and N-stage, and Gleason score (GS). Results: Of a total cohort of 1363 patients, 745 (54.7%) had high MB and 450 (33%) had low MB. Fifty-four (4%) received LPRT, of which 14.8% had high MB. Of those receiving LPRT, median PSA was 9.4, 79.6% had GS of 8-10, and 59.3% had T3-T4 disease. One or more SLE were observed in 43.5% and 37% of the control and LPRT groups, respectively. Among those with SLE, the median SLE frequency was 2 (interquartile range [IQR], 2-5) and 1 (IQR, 1-2.3) for the control and LPRT groups, respectively. On recurrent event analysis, LPRT was associated with lower risk of composite GU SLE (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.17-0.67; p = 0.002), PCN and USI (HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.05-0.84; p = 0.027) and cystoscopy (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.15-0.96; p = 0.041). Risk factors for GU SLE were T4 disease, GS of 8-10 and unknown GS. Risk factors for PCN and USI were T3, TX and N1 disease, GS of 8-10 and unknown GS. On time to first event analysis, there were no statistically significant differences for all outcomes between the control and LPRT groups. MB was not a risk factor for SLE in both analyses. Conclusions: LPRT was associated with lower risk for recurrent GU SLE, PCN and USI, and cystoscopy. The associated benefit in SLE reduction with LPRT warrants further study to determine if this effect is modified by MB and whether there may be a role for LPRT in patients with high MB.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».