Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Hommage à Roland Julie LeBlanc Roland Le Huenen was a friend, colleague, and mentor who made his first impressions on me as a doctoral student in the late 1980s, and for the past 26 years I have received the great privilege of his support as a close friend and colleague at the University of Toronto, Victoria University, the Department of French, and the Centre for Comparative Literature. Confirmation of Roland’s large academic footprint is reflected in the beautiful homages recently written by friends and colleagues throughout France and Canada. Roland exemplified the rare ability in academia to excel not only in his many fields of research but equally in administrative leadership and dedication to an endless lineup of doctoral thesis directions while always having time to care for close relationships with so many colleagues. His notoriety at the University of Toronto as a scholar and gifted pedagogue attracted the attention of numerous International institutions (Paris 7, la Sorbonne, Tel Aviv University, Université de la Réunion, etc.) and Canadian universities who solicited him as visiting professor and guest-lecturer. For almost a decade he held the Distinguished M.E. Jones Chair of Modern Languages and Literatures at the University of New York in Buffalo. Roland had a rich world: his French academic family, his close colleagues in France, nineteenth-century specialists, his collaboration with the Société des études romantiques et dix-neuviémistes, the “Groupe international d’études balzaciennes,” his world-renowned publications in prestigious French venues on travel narratives (PU Paris-Sorbonne, Presses de Rouen, PU d’Angers, etc.), his publications in collections of essays and numerous academic journals published in France. At the University of Toronto, where his scholarly achievements and international reputation were recognized by all who knew him, other facets of his academic life came to life: his role as a dedicated professor, thesis director, and gifted administrator that touched the lives of so many. [End Page 365] Honouring Roland in the journal of the Canadian Comparative Literature Association is fitting, as his last administrative position at the University of Toronto was as Chair of the Centre for Comparative Literature. Roland was passionate about the responsibilities that had been entrusted to him by the Faculty and was relentless in his dedication to the Centre, its many colleagues, graduate students, and long-serving administrators. My homage to Roland will hopefully accentuate some of his admirable accomplishments as an academic at the University of Toronto. He was an indescribably adept academic researcher and professor in so many fields of inquiry such as nineteenth-century literature, Balzac, travel narratives, and literary theory, a dedicated thesis advisor to numerous PhD students, and an effective administrator, as Graduate Chair in the Department of French and Director of the Centre for Comparative Literature for two terms. Roland completed all of his academic duties with the same degree of dedication, intensity, and ease, demonstrating total comfort and confidence. Through our many collaborations over the years including thesis directions and research endeavours, Roland was reliably generous, selfless, and kind, and naturally became a close friend and a mentor. I feel extremely privileged to have known him in these different capacities as he was a uniquely genuine person, a brilliant academic, a kind and compassionate person, whose human qualities will never be forgotten. Although we worked in different fields of inquiry, our intellectual paths crossed with our passions for autobiographical and travel narratives, literary theory, and genetic criticism, as well as our interest in visual art as it pertained to our interest in life-writing and Comparative Literature. These areas of expertise transpired into the co-direction of numerous doctoral theses focussed on a vast range of topics, and the creation of an international research group dedicated to the interdisciplinary and cultural interplay of word and image interactions in literary and theoretical contexts. In keeping with Roland’s pedagogical values, our mandate was not only to foster the interdisciplinarity of word and image studies through thought-provoking research, but also to promote teaching in this field of inquiry and directly involve students from the University of Toronto and other institutions of higher education within Canada, Europe, and the United States. Scholars from France, England...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,063 | 0,017 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».