A213 OUTCOMES OF INCIDENTAL CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA IN LIVER TRANSPLANT PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY SCLEROSING CHOLANGITIS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a predisposing factor for cholangiocarcinoma(CCA).Patients with CCA have poor outcomes post-transplant.Intrahepatic CCA is difficult to detect pre-operatively in cirrhosis.Few outcomes are reported among PSC transplant patients where CCA was incidental. Aims To determine the incidence of incidental CCA (iCCA) in PSC liver explants and the impact of iCCA on post-transplant survival for patients with PSC Methods This was a retrospective cohort study in which the medical records of PSC patients who underwent transplant at QEII Health Sciences Center in Halifax between January 1987 to March 2020 were reviewed. The incidence of iCCA was calculated. Survival analysis was performed to determine the mean time to survival among iCCA and non-iCCA groups Results A total of 94 patients were transplanted for PSC during the study period.The mean age was 43 years.Twenty-six percent were women and 74% were men.Three were iCCA, one hilar and two intrahepatic CCA. All iCCAs occurred prior to 2008. All iCCA patients had contrast enhanced CT, ERCP with cholangiogram and MRI.Two of the ERCPs reported CBD related strictures and the brushings had no evidence of malignancy.CA19-9 level was measured in one and reported as normal.Contrast enhanced MRI was not available prior to 2007. The PSC patients had 1, 5, and 10-year survival rates of 93.8%, 88.6% and 81.9% respectively.One patient required re-transplant for graft failure and died within 3 months post-transplant due to complications. In all other cases the cause of death was not identified. Among patients with iCCA, two deaths were due to metastatic cholangiocarcinoma and the other due to surgical complication in the immediate post-transplant period. None survived beyond 2 years. Conclusions Observed PSC survival in this cohort was above national average in the same period.The 3 iCCA cases identified occurred before the availability of contrast enhanced MRI. Patients with iCCA and liver transplant had poor survival at 1 and 2 years.There were no iCCA identified after 2007.These findings suggest incidental cholangiocarcinoma was effectively reduced by the advent of high-resolution imaging modality, and improvements in pre-transplant screening, including tumor marker CA19-9 and stringent patient selection. Further study involving multiple centres is necessary to draw a definite conclusion. Funding Agencies None
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».