Trends over time in survival in patients with urothelial carcinoma in the real-world: A multicenter analysis.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
412 Background: Patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) historically have poor long-term outcomes, with nearly 50% developing metastatic disease. Similarly, patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) have had median overall survivals of less than 2 years. Novel therapies have been implemented over time in attempts to improve outcomes. This study evaluates trends in survival over time in patients with MIBC and mUC treated in the real-world setting. Methods: Retrospective data was collected from two major cancer centres in Alberta and the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre in Ontario, Canada. Consecutive patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy between 01/2005 and 01/2018 who had confirmed MIBC or mUC were evaluated. Patients were excluded if they had been treated as part of a clinical trial in the first-line setting. Patients were categorized based on year of diagnosis at presentation: time period 1 (T1) diagnosed between 01/2005 and 12/2011, and time period 2 (T2) diagnosed between 01/2012 and 12/2018. The co-primary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) for MIBC, progression-free survival (PFS) for mUC, and overall survival (OS) for both. Results: 572 patients were included, 196 (78% male; median age 63.8 years) had MIBC and 376 (76% male; median age 68.4 years) were treated for mUC. Amongst patients with MIBC, 33% (65) were treated in T1 and 67% (131) in T2. Median DFS and OS were significantly improved in T2 compared to T1 for patients with MIBC (Table). On multivariate analysis, earlier year of diagnosis and ECOG status ≥2 was independently associated with poor outcomes (p=0.016 and p=0.008, respectively). Amongst patients with mUC, 205 (55%) were treated in T1 and 171 (45%) in T2. Median PFS and OS did not significantly improve over time in patients with mUC from T1 to T2 (Table). Conclusions: In this real-world analysis, outcomes for patients with MIBC have significantly improved over time. This is likely attributed to standardization of perioperative chemotherapy protocols and improvements in surgical techniques. Similar improvements have not yet been demonstrated for patients with mUC during the two time periods. However, novel therapies (eg. immunotherapy) were only approved in 2017. Future analysis may explore the reasons for improvement in patients with MIBC and will evaluate outcomes in mUC patients treated from 2017 onwards. CI= confidence interval, HR= hazard ratio. [Table: see text]
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».