MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3135795032 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwab002.057

A59 SEVERE CHEMOTHERAPY-INDUCED SECRETORY DIARRHEA

2021· article· en· W3135795032 sur OpenAlexaff
M Emmerick, A Eindor, Kevan Jacobson, Richard A. Schreiber

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueNeutropenia and Cancer Infections
Établissements canadiensBC Children's Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOctreotideMedicineLoperamideDiarrheaGastroenterologyInternal medicineChemotherapySomatostatin

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background Diarrhea is one of the most common side effects of chemotherapy, estimated to occur in up to 40% of all patients undergoing cancer therapy. Non-complicated chemotherapy-induced diarrhea (CID) can be managed with loperamide, whereas complicated CID should be treated with continuous infusion of octreotide. Octreotide is usually effective within 48hs of administration. Options for patients that do not respond to loperamide or octreotide include atropine, oral budesonide and cholestyramine. Aims To describe the case of an 18 yo girl with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who developed severe secretory diarrhea during her treatment course. Methods Retrospective case report. Results The patient was initially treated with Cytarabine, Daunorubicin and Etoposide, and on her third cycle, Gemtuzumab was added. Four weeks later she presented with watery diarrhea up to 6 L/day. She continued with high output despite no oral intake, which was consistent with secretory diarrhea. Infectious workup was negative, and she received Loperamide. Her output decreased to 1 L for 2 days but then increased again to 6 L. She deteriorated and loperamide was switched to octreotide 0.8mcg/Kg/h. The dose was increased to 1.2mcg/Kg/h and she presented blood in the stools. Her stool output was still 4 L/day and octreotide was stopped after one week. Flex sigmoidoscopy showed proctocolitis with friability. Biopsy showed architectural distortion with loss of the superficial epithelium. She was emotionally distressed due to many days of no oral intake, hence Pediasure peptide was introduced, with no changes in the output. Rice was introduced but her diarrhea worsened, and oral intake was stopped again. Four weeks after the onset of diarrhea, her stool output was still above 2 L/day, and cholestyramine 4g once daily was started. Four days later her output decreased and diet was slowly introduced. Two weeks later she had a normal stool output. Cholestyramine was stopped and she was discharged home. Finding the culprit for this case is a challenge, but important to avoid this drug in the future as prior history of CID is a risk factor for a new-onset. Gemtuzumab is a relatively new anti-CD33 antibody used in AML, and results from a meta-analysis showed that adding it to induction chemotherapy may increase the incidence of diarrhea. Her diarrhea started four weeks after the dose of Gemtuzumab, and we believe this new agent might have played an important role in her case. To our knowledge, there are no cases in the literature associating Gemtzumab with such prolonged and severe diarrhea. Conclusions This was a challenging case of CID that did not respond to Loperamide or octreotide and caused a lot of emotional distress for the patient and her providers. Since she responded well to cholestyramine, we recommend its use when the loperamide and octreotide have failed, or in addition to octreotide in severe cases. Funding Agencies None

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,195
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,818

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,240
Écart entre enseignants0,230 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologyMême sujetNeutropenia and Cancer InfectionsTravaux en français237 207