Francophone Cultures through Film by Nabil Boudraa, Cécile Accilien
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviews 293 filles Marie au moment du baptême” (xix). To avoid any confusion, Morrissette explains that“les prénoms Marie et Joseph ne font pas partie du prénom au quotidien. Ainsi, depuis ma naissance, on m’appelle simplement Vincent”(xx). In a similar manner , Blood explains her family’s background and how despite her grandmother Bernadette Plouffe’s decision to stay in New York to marry an American Anglophone, her family maintained tight connections with its Francophone family in Saint-Félixde -Valois, a small town to the east of Montreal. Canisius College (NY) Eileen M. Angelini Boudraa,Nabil,and Cécile Accilien. Francophone Cultures through Film. Newburyport : Focus, 2014. ISBN 978-1-58510-311-9. Pp. 237. $33. In a time where programs are looking to continue to diversify course offerings to increase intercultural competency among students, to treat the idea of texts in a broader way, and to present the diversity of Francophone cultures, this book fills a particular niche. Demonstrative of the need that Francophone Cultures through Film addresses, there are limited options for textbooks that survey a variety of Francophone cultures and simultaneously focus on film as a medium as this textbook does. Though not geographically comprehensive, it presents a wide variety of contexts (North and Sub-Saharan Africa, the Caribbean, Southeast Asia, Québec, and Europe) through films from 1965 to 2009. The approach taken is engaging and content-based, guiding intermediate and upper-level students toward both visual and cultural literacy by inviting them to analyze films through a focus on conversation, reading, and writing activities. The authors provide additional pedagogical suggestions, such as having students write film reviews for each unit and keep an ongoing film journal in order to foster both reflection and critical analysis. The thematic organization of this textbook (colonialism, independence, cultural diversity, immigration and exile, women’s issues) allows for its use as a primary or supplemental text in a variety of courses. Further, for instructors focusing on a particular theme or time period, individual sections can be purchased for course packets. The book begins with cinematic vocabulary, a list of important film festivals and awards, and a list of relevant acronyms. Each unit has preand post-viewing activities, a glossary of important terms used in each film, a country information summary page, short biographies of directors and main actors, an interview or other related text, and a suggested bibliography. Individuals incorporating films into literature-focused courses will find these interviews and suggested literary pairings particularly useful. However, for instructors wishing to include grammatical revision or translation in their courses, this textbook will need to be supplemented with other materials. Issues of access to films may remain an issue, but this has been mitigated by the authors who have selected films that are popular in the United States. Further, the authors and publisher provide information regarding where such films may be purchased or rented by students and instructors and offer the suggestion of organizing a film festival alongside the course in which the textbook is to be used. Outside of courses, this text may prove to be a valuable resource for those organizing film nights for French clubs or French and Francophone film festivals. The potential cost issues for students renting or purchasing films is also mitigated by the affordability of the textbook itself. University of South Dakota Kris Aric Knisely Oukada, Larbi, Didier Bertrand, and Janet Solberg. Controverses. 3rd ed. Boston: Cengage, 2016. ISBN 13 978-1-305-10578-2. Pp. 293. $150. Designed for students at the intermediate level, this eight-chapter text presents a variety of exercises that help students develop more sophisticated levels of oral and written expression. The materials available include a text (manuel), a Student Activities Manual (cahier d’activités), and online supersite. The bulk of grammar review is contained in the Student Activities Manual; most of the text is organized around contemporary and controversial topics such as globalization, immigration, and gender equality. The chapters are designed to encourage students to examine these topics from various points of view as they acquire the skills necessary to discuss and write about each topic.An interesting and unique aspect to Controverses is...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,029 | 0,010 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».