Augmented interferon I signaling in a patient with COVID toes
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Dermatological manifestation in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) can occur either as a direct implication of COVID-19 or due to other incidental skin changes during COVID-19 infection. Since the detail of each subtype has not been fully described, careful evaluation will be needed. A 49-year-old man presented with a 7-days history of violaceous, infiltrated plaques on the distal site of extremities with a 4-day history of acute fever and headache at July 2020. The skin lesion was not accompanied by purpura, ulcer, target lesion, but with pain and burning sensation (Figure 1). The patient had experienced herpes simplex on the lips several times before, however, did not have any other disease/medication/family history. Complete skin and mucosal examination results were otherwise unremarkable. Blood cell counts were normal in white blood cells (7620/µL), and thrombocytes (148,000/µL) with elevated atypical lymphocyte count up to 980/µL and elevated eosinophil count (460/µL), and decreased lymphocyte count to 530/µL. General biochemistry was normal except for high aspartate trans aminase (38 U/L), alanine transaminase (80 U/L), lactic acid dehydrogenase (446 U/L; normal < 221) and C-reactive protein (1.65 mg/dL). Although polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test result for COVID-19 on a nasopharyngeal swab was negative, serum IgM antibody against SARS-CoV-2 was turned positive from day 25 to 45 (by antibody test kit: Artron Laboratories, Burnaby, BC, Canada). Antibody test of other viruses, including cytomegalovirus, Epstein–Barr virus, herpes simplex virus, rubeola virus, rubella virus, human herpes virus-6, or influenza virus showed negative or inactive. Autoantibodies, including antinuclear antibody and antimelanoma differentiation antigen five antibody were negative. Computerized tomography revealed no complications in the lung. Histopathological findings of the skin biopsy taken from the dorsal site of the right foot at day 2 showed spongiosis and enhanced edema in epidermis, with mononuclear cell infiltration to epidermis, dermal vessels, and appendix (Figure 1d). The expression of myxovirus resistance protein 1 (MxA, a type 1 interferon-inducible protein) was significantly up-regulated in epidermis, dermal vascular lesions, and appendix (detected by specific antibody, ss-166412: Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX, USA: Figure 1e).1, 2 The patient was treated by initial 30 mg/day prednisolone (started from day 4, reduced the dose 10 mg/day every week). The symptoms and signs disappeared with pigmentation and membrane-like desquamation after two weeks (Figure 1f). The relationship between this acral lesion and SARS-CoV-2 is controversial, mainly because there is a minority of patients with COVID toes who are positive (only 13 patients out of 88) for PCR tests.3 The current patient showed positive IgM antibody against SARS-CoV-2, although SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody had been negative. This did not indicate that IgM SARS-CoV-2 was false positive, since the system uses the same antigen for both IgM and IgG in the same strip. The patient did not switch the antibody class to IgG. Monogenic autoinflammatory interferonopathy, Aicardi-Goutières syndrome, appears similar to toe lesions of the current case. The expression of MxA was up-regulated in this case. Therefore, local interferon induced by COVID19 may cause the erythema. Taken together, toe lesions of COVID-19 could be one of the valuable indicators for COVID-19, although further studies are needed. None declared.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle