MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3137415359 · doi:10.1353/tfr.2016.0132

Jean-Luc Godard, Cinema Historian by Michael Witt

2016· article· en· W3137415359 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ann M. Moore

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œFrench review · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueCinema and Media Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDramaPrisonDanceSociologyMovie theaterArt historyTributeNightlifeArtHistoryMedia studiesVisual arts

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviews 207 Quebec. Mère Augustine, as talented an administrator as she was formerly a pianist, oversees her little community and its convent school, known for its excellent music program. Vatican II lurks uncomfortably, the Canadian government is taking charge of education, religious schools are closing, and Augustine’s rebellious niece—a musical prodigy—arrives as a student. Augustine’s worlds collide. Pool adroitly interweaves the nuns’ public personae and their efforts to save their school, indeed their community , with vignettes of private moments and past lives. Individuals gradually emerge from the conformity of the black habits.We hear the music, integral to the convent and its teaching mission; we see iconic shots of snow, forests, and snow geese that suggest the sisters’ spiritual connection to their life and its activities. Their interactions with students add moments of drama as well as humor. Pool’s film constitutes a warm tribute to these women and their contributions to Quebec culture and history. In director/writer Mehdi Charef’s Graziella, time passes tentatively for a former nurse who loved to dance and a former projectionist who visualizes life in terms of movies—both prison inmates on work-leaves prior to their imminent release. Housed in adjoining cells at night, they ponder reintegrating themselves into a society that has neither forgotten nor forgiven their past actions. In spite of the odds arrayed against her, Graziella (Rossy de Palma) stubbornly pursues a second chance at life, one which includes Antoine (Denis Lavant). Experience teaching in prison literacy programs inspired this script and so realism is chillingly gritty at times. Nevertheless, Charef— a consummate storyteller—ends his tale on just a tiny note of redemption for his two humble protagonists. I could not resist cheering them on their way. University of Idaho, emerita Joan M. West Witt, Michael. Jean-Luc Godard, Cinema Historian. Indianapolis: Indiana UP, 2013. ISBN 978-0-253-00728-5. Pp. 274. $35. Faithfully encapsulating and conveying his belief in cinema’s unique ability to capture and express history as it unfolds, Godard’s Histoire(s) du cinéma stands as the culmination of a lifetime of work. Originally released in 1998 by Gaumont, the video project acts as a lens through which scholars can analyze all things Godard. Michael Witt explores the themes presented in Histoire(s) du cinéma, as they relate to Godard’s three previous decades of work. According to Witt, one key point to note in analyzing Godard’s work is cinema’s dependence on the individual spectator for the creation of meaning. According to Godard, meaning is created “at the juncture of memory, thought and emotion”(18) not of the collective viewing audience, but of the singular spectator. Therefore, what is viewed and understood is relative to the one doing the viewing, and the individual is forced to become part of the creation process. Recycling is another important component in the comprehension of Godard’s project. In the compilation of images, scenes, and words that make up Histoire(s) du cinéma, Godard relies heavily on the usage of films and art already in existence. Through the mélange of pre-existing works, Godard was able, according to Witt, to portray the camera as an X-ray machine (98–99) with the ability to bear witness to imperceptible realities and to social injustices present throughout history. This understanding of the role of the camera is further reinforced through Godard’s intertextual dialogue with found footage essayists of his time, such as Santiago Álvarez, Mikhail Romm, Chris Marker and Artavazd Peleshian. Throughout his analysis,Witt points to many individuals and ideas that influenced Godard, including, but not limited to, Guy Debord, well-known for his theories on recycling and resistance, Deleuze and Hugo, for their use of art and text as resistance, as well as Faure and Malraux, art historians, and Merleau-Ponty, a theorist. Another important aspect to note in the creation of Histoire(s) du cinéma is the amount of time Godard spent refining his ideas and piecing together the film. On many different occasions, and with various colleagues, Godard set out to create a film about the importance of capturing history through cinema...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,635
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,734

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,001
Communication savante0,0040,002
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,2150,042

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,224
Écart entre enseignants0,197 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue˜The œFrench reviewMême sujetCinema and Media StudiesTravaux en français237 207