MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3138537232 · doi:10.21125/inted.2021.1108

EDUCATIONAL AND DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVE OF STUDENTS IN RURAL AREAS: A SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH

2021· article· en· W3138537232 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueINTED proceedings · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueHungarian Social, Economic and Educational Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGraduation (instrument)ResidencePlan (archaeology)Quarter (Canadian coin)Perspective (graphical)Sample (material)SociologyPerceptionPedagogyPublic relationsMedical educationPsychologyEconomic growthPolitical scienceGeographyEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Numerous studies show that young people in Croatia consider education and educational achievements to be very important social values, but also their skepticism about recognizing the potential of education as a factor influencing personal development and social mobility. This especially refers to rural youth whose perspectives are associated with leaving the place of residence or the one in which they are studying. The aim of this paper is to examine student perspectives on future development as well as the development of the local community or region in which respondents live and study. The research was conducted in 2017 using a survey method on a sample of 228 students at two polytechnics in Croatia - Polytechnic of Šibenik and Marko Marulić Polytechnic in Knin. In particular, the results of research on the perception of the importance of education stand out, showing that more than a third of surveyed students believe that the study they attend is well designed, but they are not sure how much they will be able to use it as future professionals. At the same time, most students emphasize that the region in which they live and study has great potential for development in natural and human resources, but they are not used in the right way. Although slightly less than half of students think that they will be employed in their profession after graduation, a quarter of them are not so optimistic, so they plan some type of study activities related to studying abroad as well as possible going abroad. Therefore, after graduation, the reasons to stay in the place where they are studying would be finding a job and being near to their family. As the most common reasons for leaving Croatia after graduation, students state the impossibility of finding a job and advancement in their profession and poor living conditions. They believe that easy finding a job in their profession should be mostly influenced by their own efforts and/or existing knowledge in the field of studies, as well as already acquired work experience in their profession and demand for the profession. Students find aggravating factors for finding a job of their profession in underestimating young professionals, lack of work experience, high unemployment rate and generally bad situation in the country. Finally, their professional goals are primarily related to finding a permanent and secure job that will ensure their existence, and creative and dynamic job in their profession that will be socially useful. On the other hand, they are least interested in doing scientific work and starting their own business, since their aspirations are mostly related to jobs in public companies, which suggests that the educational process lacks the development of entrepreneurial competencies or entrepreneurial culture among young people. In this sense, when it comes to the rural environment, the problem of the effectiveness of education arises in the context of its disconnection with the local economy or its local inadaptability.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,273
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,260

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,116
Tête enseignante GPT0,450
Écart entre enseignants0,333 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle