La rencontre des langues dans le cinéma francophone: Québec, Afrique subsaharienne, France-Maghreb by John Kristian Sanaker
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
syntax of many passages. In most instances, the terms validation/invalidation, nécessaire , possible, probable, douteux, souhaitable, regrettable, obligatoire, redouté might have served the author’s purposes equally well. San Diego State University (CA) Thomas J. Cox SANAKER, JOHN KRISTIAN. La rencontre des langues dans le cinéma francophone: Québec, Afrique subsaharienne, France-Maghreb. Québec: PU de Laval, 2010. ISBN 978-27637 -9048-0. Pp. 175. $24,95 Can. The study of contact between French and other modern languages, as well as between “standardized” French and regional or national “versions,” has long been at the forefront of diverse scholarship in many disciplines. Despite the broad treatment of these topics in a variety of critical methodologies and from many theoretical perspectives, the question of the textualization of linguistic encounters in French-language cinemas has received little academic attention. Sanaker’s book seeks to fill that void. With a background in French literature and linguistics, Sanaker sets out in this interdisciplinary work to explore “la mixité langagière” (backcover) in contemporary filmmaking from Quebec, Sub-Saharan Africa (notably Senegal and Burkina Faso), and the Maghreb (mostly Algeria). As the series director of the collection Cinéma et Société, Yves Laberge prefaces the book by questioning whether la francophonie is implicitly bilingual and discussing the link between multilingualism and the world of film. Laberge also provides important preparation for Sanaker’s coinage and treatment of hétérolinguisme, which is to say “le fait de recourir à plusieurs langues dans un même contexte narratif” (xx). Sanaker’s book and its preface highlight productive and unique relationships among the fields of linguistics, film, and Francophone studies. Sanaker begins with a concise overview of the history and theory concerning the studies of l’autre langue and linguistic encounters found in literature and cinema . It provides a clear lens through which Sanaker analyzes each “national” cinema and its mise en langue in subsequent chapters. Film scholars without a strong background in linguistics might find some of the terminology and concepts difficult to grasp. Sanaker is to be applauded, however, for striking an effective balance between discipline-specific vocabulary and non-specialized terms through employing a clear treatment of content matter that should appeal to and satisfy both specialists and novices alike. In the three major chapters of the book, he explores themes found in various Francophone cinemas. To begin, he analyzes the topic of hétérolinguisme in Québécois cinema through a discussion of a half dozen contemporary films that juxtapose the uses of French and English. He then studies hétérolinguisme in relation to cinema from Africa “dite francophone” (104) through a brief discussion of Souleymane Cissé’s, Idrissa Ouedraogo’s, and Cheick Oumar Sissoko’s work (among others) and a more complete treatment of Ousmane Sembène’s corpus. Finally, he explores connections between hétérolinguisme and history with regard to the conflicted historical relationship between France and Algeria, as represented linguistically in six well-known war genre films. In his conclusion, Sanaker highlights the main arguments of the preceding chapters and situates them within the context of “l’altérité [linguistique] au cinéma” (159). While the book is an excellent contribution to the question and study of linguistic encounters in French-language cinemas, Sanaker’s study of each “national” 608 FRENCH REVIEW 85.3 cinema is somewhat unbalanced. His treatment of Québécois cinema is the most complete and is approximately twice the length of the other two studies. One might wonder how Sanaker’s research could also inform and be impacted by the study of Maghrebian films (and/or films made in France by émigré filmmakers and French filmmakers of North African heritage) that are not limited to the subject matter of the French-Algerian war or situated in a colonial context. In addition , the book would benefit from the inclusion of an index, which would enhance its practical use for research and classroom purposes. Despite these limitations, Sanaker presents his arguments clearly and convincingly, while developing solid analyses and providing stimulating original reflection. This book will be of interest to scholars and students in French and Francophone studies as well as to...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,005 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,014 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».