Introduction of anaesthesia podcasts in our system - A pressing priority for the betterment of clinical practice
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Sir, Podcasts in medicine are valuable educational tools to aid in better clinical practice. Podcasts are digital audio files that give insight into various topics and are accessible through a Smartphone or a Computer. Anaesthesia podcasts will be fruitful in learning clinical updates, clarifying grey areas in the subject and getting to know what's new. Countries such as the United States, Canada have an anaesthesia podcast series that is running successfully. Podcasts can be didactic lectures, panel discussions and interesting case scenarios. In India, we lack anaesthesia podcasts which could serve as a learning platform for the anaesthesia postgraduates and the practising anesthesiologists as well. An audit among anaesthesia residents in India observed their interest in academic updates and learning recent advances.[1] Podcasts are a magnificent e-learning modality that can deliver the facts in a simple style. Audio podcasts are easy to produce and can be listened to while in a commute or during leisure activities. Standard textbooks in anaesthesia will need ample time for the next edition to get published; whereas, podcasts can convey the current evidence straightaway. A survey among anaesthesia residents had concluded that podcasts are a welcoming and preferable mode of learning among them.[2] International journals in anaesthesia publish an accompanying podcast with the editorial article or special articles.[3] In this technological era, any professional has got easy access to the web through the gadgets at any time. Podcasts have gained popularity among the anaesthesia residents as a sensible resource of knowledge. Postgraduates may find it handy to recap the topics before their exams while clinicians may refresh their knowledge before an unfamiliar case scenario. Any updates in the previous clinical podcasts can be addressed in the forthcoming ones. Various institutional protocols and knowledge of individual expertise can be shared nationwide through podcasts to help with clinical knowledge and tough clinical decisions. Daniel et al.[4] highlighted positive educational outcomes of podcasts with respect to impact on clinical practice, skill acquisition, knowledge and satisfaction. Self-assessment tests at the end of the podcasts will assist in conserving knowledge. Table 1 highlights the desirable features of a podcast.Table 1: Desirable features of a podcastThere are equivocal reviews about the production costs involved in a podcast. Nevertheless, the cost relies on hardwares, audio interface and the e-portals chosen to publish the podcast.[4] Ease of use, access at any time, unlike a webinar or Continuous Medical Education (CME) programme, downloadable option, cost-effectiveness and quality presentations will make podcasts a future boom. The moving trend towards digital education in the pushing times of the current pandemic will favour podcasts as a wonderful choice for anaesthesiologists. However, the challenge here is the quality of the podcast in all aspects. Lin and colleagues reported thirteen quality indicators for podcasts used in medical education with respect to credibility, content and design which could be considered in evaluating the quality of a podcast.[5] The criteria that is to be met for an expert peer reviewer is either an author of a published textbook, peer-reviewed article or a national speaker. Peer review can be done in the pre-release phase of the podcast.[6] The workflow of podcast production is represented in Figure 1.Figure 1: Workflow of Podcast ProductionThe educators could verify that the contents are evidence-based and peer review can be done by the expert reviewers before it is presented in the public forum. Quality of the podcast could be prioritised, based on content, evidence, concise presentation, clarity and being uncompounded. Indian Society of Anaesthesiologists (ISA) could address the initiation of anaesthesia podcast series for the benefit of anaesthesiologists and establishing better standards in clinical practice nationwide. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,009 | 0,012 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».