Develop a comprehensive hypertension prediction model and risk score in population-based data applying conventional statistical and machine learning approaches
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Hypertension is a common medical condition and is a significant risk factor for heart attack, stroke, kidney disease, and mortality. Developing a risk prediction model for hypertension incidence incorporating its risk factors can help identify high-risk individuals who should be targeted for healthy behavioral changes or medical treatment to prevent hypertension onset. This research aims to develop a robust hypertension prediction model for the general population. More specifically, we aimed to 1) conduct a comprehensive systematic review to identify risk factors and prediction models for hypertension incidence and perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the current model’s predictive performance. 2) develop a risk prediction model for incident hypertension in a Canadian cohort using a traditional modeling approach. 3) develop machine learning algorithms to predict hypertension incidence and compare their predictive performance with a traditional statistical model. We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and the grey literature for studies predicting the risk of hypertension among the general adult population. We identified 52 studies that presented 117 models, of which 75 were developed using traditional regression-based modeling and 42 using machine learning algorithms. No studies were from Canada where a hypertension prediction model was developed or validated. Meta-analysis showed the overall pooled C-statistics 0.75 [0.73 – 0.77] for the traditional regression-based models and 0.76 [0.72 – 0.79] for the machine learning-based models. The lack of a hypertension prediction model in a Canadian context motivated us to develop a new model. We used the data of 18,322 participants on 29 candidate variables from the large Alberta’s Tomorrow Project (ATP) to develop traditional Cox proportional hazards (PH) model. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diabetes, total physical activity time, and cardiovascular disease were used as significant risk factors in the model. Our model showed good discrimination (Harrel’s C-statistic 0.77) and calibration (Grønnesby and Borgan test, χ^2 statistic = 8.75, p = 0.07; calibration slope 1.006). A risk score table to estimate hypertension risks at 2-, 3-, 5-, and 6-year were derived from the model to favor the model’s clinical implementation and workability. Five machine learning algorithms were also developed to predict hypertension incidence: penalized regression Ridge, Lasso, Elastic Net (EN), random survival forest (RSF), and gradient boosting (GB). The performance of machine learning algorithms was observed, similar to the traditional Cox PH model. Average C-indexes were 0.78, 0.78, 0.78, 0.76, 0.76, for Ridge, Lasso, Elastic Net, RSF, GB, respectively. Important features associated with each machine learning algorithms were also presented. We developed a simple yet practical prediction model to estimate the risk of incident hypertension for the Canadian population that relies on readily available variables. Our results showed little predictive performance difference between machine learning algorithms and the traditional Cox PH model in predicting hypertension incidence. Our newly developed model may help clinicians, and the general population assess their risks of new-onset hypertension and facilitate discussions on preventing this risk more effectively.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».