Discourses of Non-Formal Pedagogy in Two Youth-Oriented Indonesian Environmental NGOs
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
AbstractThis article compares two youth-oriented ENGOs (Environmental Non-Government Organisations) in Indonesia. Comparative analysis focuses on how the two organisations provide discourses that configure differently the pedagogic space of experiential learning for children and young people. Despite an apparent low level of environmental awareness generally among the Indonesian population there does seem to be some enthusiasm for environmental activities among certain groups of young people. However, it seems different kinds of young people are drawn to different kinds of environmental activities. Conceptually, if we accept that there is an imagined space of the nation (Anderson, 1991) we can logically propose an imagined national space of the physical environment. Thus different agents of change will imagine and configure this space differently so that certain kinds of engagement and learning follow. Escobar (1999) points out that what we perceive in the environment as is always also cultural and social. So for example, transnational logging companies understand the Indonesian forests as a natural resource to be exploited, while student nature-lover groups - Mahasiswa Pencinta Alam - constitute forests as recreational places to camp and walk in nature. This paper examines two ENGOs designed to appeal to young Indonesians: Sahabat Alam - Friends of Nature - founded in 2008 by a 12 year old schoolgirl after Jakarta flooding, and Tanam Untuk Kehidupan - Planting for Life - an arts collective which aims for learning about the environment through creative practices and festivals in Salatiga.Keywords: non-formal education, environmentalism, Indonesia, NGOs, young people1. Introduction1.1 Indonesia and Environmental AwarenessThe Indonesian archipelago is a site of extraordinary tropical biodiversity. However, a long history of natural resource extraction has stripped forests away and damaged ecosystems, sometimes irreparably. The islands are vulnerable to rising sea levels and geothermal activity. Illegal forest burning blankets the nearby region in thick, choking smoke every year. Concerted action needs to be taken now to reverse damaging environmental trends that threaten not only the nation, but the region and the world, since Indonesia is the world's third largest emitter of greenhouse gases that cause global climate change (Measey, 2010, p. 31). Yet relatively little is happening on the ground.Indonesia is the largest Muslim majority country in the world, with a population of over 250 million. The median age is 28.9 years, and 44 per cent of the population lives in urban areas (BPS, 2012). Indonesia is currently ranked at only 121 of 187 countries according to the 2013 Human Development Index. There are still high levels of poverty, unemployment and corruption (World Bank, 2013). The current strong economic growth rate signals the expansion of the urban middle class, incurring higher rates of domestic consumerism, energy usage and CO2 (Savage, 2012, p. 244), with more industry, more vehicles, larger houses, more roads and greater stress on already weak urban infrastucture such as water supply, drainage, rubbish disposal and sewerage. Urban prosperity has also seen an increase in resource-intensive shopping mall culture (Douglass et al., 2008). In other words, as the nation has grown economically, so has the negative impact on the urban environment.The countryside has also felt the impact. 80 per cent of Indonesian greenhouse gas emissions result from changed land use following logging and forest/swamp fires, especially deforestation (World Bank, 2011). The Kyoto Protocol was signed by Indonesia in 1998 and ratified in 2004. However, despite policies and regulations to reduce greenhouse emissions by roughly 26 per cent (World Bank, 2010), and the goal of a 41 per cent reduction with donor assistance, progress has been slow. Legal implementation and enforcement remains very weak (Measey, 2010, p. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,012 | 0,014 |
| Communication savante | 0,007 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,008 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».