MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3142584324 · doi:10.1111/acem.14257

Hot off the press: the RAMPED trial—methoxyflurane for analgesia in the emergency department

2021· letter· en· W3142584324 sur OpenAlexaff
Christopher Bond, Lauren M. Westafer, Kirsty Challen, William K. Milne

Notice bibliographique

RevueAcademic Emergency Medicine · 2021
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueEmergency and Acute Care Studies
Établissements canadiensWestern UniversityUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Mots-clésMedicineMethoxyfluraneEmergency departmentAnalgesicOvercrowdingRandomized controlled trialHydromorphoneAnesthesiaPain managementEmergency medicineIntensive care medicineOpioidPsychiatrySurgeryInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Pain is one of the primary reasons that patients present to the emergency department (ED).1-6 Oligoanalgesia is a significant problem and effective pain management is an important indicator of the quality of patient care.7-12 Multiple factors have been thought to contribute to oligoanalgesia including overcrowding, language barriers, age, sex, ethnicity, and insurance status.13-16 Delays in providing adequate analgesia lead to poorer patient outcomes, prolonged ED length of stay, and reduced patient satisfaction.17, 18 Previous research in Australian EDs has shown that the median time to analgesia administration can be between 40 and 70 minutes, while one study in the United States reported a mean of 116 minutes.19-21 To minimize delays, various strategies have been implemented to address the problem, including the use of novel analgesic agents that do not require intravenous access.22 Recently, there has been increased interest in using methoxyflurane (Penthrox), an inhaled nonopioid volatile anesthetic, to provide rapid short-term analgesia.23, 24 In Australia, methoxyflurane has been widely used at subanesthetic doses for analgesia in the prehospital setting since 1975. It has been used more widely recently and at low doses and has a very reassuring safety profile, with no reports of addiction or abuse related to its use.25-28 The majority of studies of methoxyflurane for pain focus on traumatic pain; this study aimed to assess its effectiveness in treatment of both traumatic and nontraumatic pain. This is a randomized controlled trial of adult ED patients with severe pain, defined by an initial numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score of greater than or equal to 8 on an 11-point scale. Treatment arm participants were given inhaled methoxyflurane at ED triage and the comparison group received standard analgesic care, which could include acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), tramadol, oral oxycodone, or intravenous morphine. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who had at least a 50% reduction in pain score at 30 minutes. Secondary outcomes included median pain score at 15, 30, 60, and 90 minutes; the proportion of patients that achieved a >2-point drop in their NRS pain score, and data pertaining to adverse effects. The most notable limitation of this study is the open-label design. There is substantial difficulty in blinding study participants to the use of an inhaled medication (methoxyflurane) that has a particular smell and taste, but the lack of allocation concealment likely biases the results toward the intervention group. Other limitations include the selection bias of nonconsecutive patient recruitment and the exclusion criteria which removed many patients with abnormal vital signs. These abnormal vital signs could have simply been due to severe pain and thus would be an excellent group of patients to study. Finally, only 4% of patients arrived by ambulance in this study, which may not be representative of many hospitals. Overall, 121 patients were randomized into the RAMPED study and there was no statistical difference in the primary outcome between methoxyflurane and standard analgesic care. In the methoxyflurane arm five (10%) patients had a reduction of pain score by >50% at 30 minutes compared with three (5%) in the standard care arm (p = 0.49). The administration of methoxyflurane was associated with a significant reduction in pain score at all time points and a notable secondary outcome was that the median time to rescue analgesia was longer in the methoxyflurane arm, 66 minutes compared with 46 minutes in the standard care arm (p = 0.024). There were no adverse effects attributed to the methoxyflurane. In this study of methoxyflurane versus standard analgesic therapy in the ED, there was no difference in pain reduction at 30 minutes. However, methoxyflurane does appear to be a safe and effective additional option for analgesic at ED triage. Brent Driscoll: Great rapid analgesic for procedural and visceral pain even better when used in conjunction with opiates. Great synergistic effect. Fell out of favour for a while the excitement of intranasal fentanyl took hold but back in vogue as quick effective relief in trauma while IV access and opiates are readied. The ability of the patient to concentrate and titrate their dosage ("if it hurts, keep sucking") and that it is self-regulating- if they have too much, they drop the inhaler and nod off is a great quality control. An Australian EMS staple for decades. Minh Le Cong @ketaminh: It's a great piece of kit imo. I have one in my car kit for roadside attendances. Easy to use and effective in kids and adults. There is environmental contamination of exhaled gas to be aware of. It's like a portable mini nitrous oxide kit. Julie Rankin @JulieRa00539796: Regular analgesia use for msk injuries in Northern Ireland - great quick easy effective analgesia. Prof Tim Hardcastle @vemadoc: They use it for burn dressing changes here. Works well in kids. Evan Schwarz @TheSchwarziee: This seems to be very popular in countries outside the US. It's nice as no IV required and can be another component of multimodal pain medication whether an opioid is necessary or not. In this randomized controlled trial, methoxyflurane was an effective analgesic agent for severe pain but was no more effective than standard analgesic care at 30 minutes. If available it remains an alternative analgesic strategy to usual therapies. The authors have no potential conflicts to disclose.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,012
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,040

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,002
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,002
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0120,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,098
Tête enseignante GPT0,386
Écart entre enseignants0,288 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2021
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAcademic Emergency MedicineMême sujetEmergency and Acute Care StudiesTravaux en français237 207