Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The authors state that the aim of this book is to present the published methods for designing stairs, especially for free standing and spiral, helical, elliptical shaped stairs. They state the target audience is the practicing professional as well as students and professors. There are five chapters as follows: • Chapter 1 shows the different forms a stair can take, discusses wood, steel, and concrete as materials, and compares code stresses in four countries, including Canada. • Chapter 2 outlines all available classical methods of structural analysis. • Chapter 3 presents flexibility, stiffness, and finite element analyses. • Chapter 4 compares stresses found using the different analysis method. • Chapter 5 outlines some design examples and detailing of various stair types and methods. The bibliographical references allow for in-depth research. Two appendices show European practice of redistribution of movements and contain design drawings of unusual stairs as detailed in various countries. Worked examples of analyses are included. Pages 59–65 have excellent sketches of the in-plane forces developed in stairs; page 71 illustrates the deflections of a free standing stair with no supports at the landing. Helical stairs are analyzed in a clear manner following page 132. The explanatory diagrams for space truss theory for dealing with torsion on page 240 are helpful in visualizing this topic. The book is unique in its topic of designing stairs; the reviewer has not seen another text on this topic. The practicing engineer will be able to design unusual stairs with increased confidence. The authors have developed a generalized method based on older work by Gould. Strengths and weaknesses. There are good illustrations of the various forms and shapes of stairs, and an excellent presentation of the effects of arch actions and resulting horizontal forces. The flexibility method in Chapter 3 appears practical for designers. There is a good explanation of torque and its analysis in Chapter 5. Some weaknesses are the variety of units used in the illustrations, SI metric, imperial, and the older European metric, due to the sources of the drawings being from all over the world and some are older drawings. Some of the reinforcing details are incorrect; re-entrant corners require reinforcing to be detailed to prevent “pop out” of the concrete by bent bars in tension. In general then some of the detailed examples are not current practice in Canada. The design of stairs is rarely a topic in undergraduate, or even at the masters level. Thus this textbook is useful to any structural engineering office both as an aid to inexperienced engineers, but also for assistance in designing more unusual stairs, such as stairs with freestanding unsupported landings, spiral or helical stairs that are sometimes required in public spaces. The development of horizontal reactions is helpful, normally they are ignored, and designers should be made aware of their presence.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,046 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».