Is It Time to Rethink the Age-Old Practice of Permissive Hyperkalemia in Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone Inhibition?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
See Clinical Research on Page 1309 See Clinical Research on Page 1309 The immediate consequences of acute, severe hyperkalemia are well recognized in medicine. High extracellular potassium levels result in decreased cardiac membrane potential resulting in fatal arrhythmias, including ventricular fibrillation, asystole, and cardiac arrest. Chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, and their associated medications that interfere with the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system predispose patients to hyperkalemia and associated acute adverse outcomes. Although the association between severe hyperkalemia and increased mortality is well established, the clinical significance of mild hyperkalemia remains poorly described.1Collins A. Pitt B. Reaven N. et al.Association of serum potassium with all-cause mortality in patients with and without heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and/or diabetes.Am J Nephrol. 2017; 46: 213-221Crossref PubMed Scopus (179) Google Scholar Part of the challenge has been the confusion that results from the presence of comorbidities that confer worse outcomes as well as the adverse consequences associated with the initiation of potassium-lowering treatments, such as sodium polystyrene sulfonate or the discontinuation of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibition (RAASi) medications. The widespread use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and RAASi has led to increased rates of hyperkalemia. Among those with chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, and heart failure on RAASi, permissive hyperkalemia is considered an acceptable consequence to be able to gain the inferred renal and cardioprotective benefits of RAASi. Interestingly, recent observational studies suggest that patients with low-grade hyperkalemia (serum K = 5.0–5.5 mmol/l) may also have higher mortality risk. Unfortunately, longitudinal analyses of the association of hyperkalemia and outcomes have been largely limited to the acute, inpatient population, thus limiting the generalizability of the results. Although Hughes-Austin et al.2Hughes-Austin J. Rifkin D. Beben T. et al.The relationship of serum potassium concentration with cardiovascular events and mortality in community-living individuals.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017; 12: 245-252Crossref PubMed Scopus (52) Google Scholar described increased cardiovascular events and mortality risk with even small increases in serum potassium in community-living individuals in 2017, the cohort was relatively small. In this issue, Hougen et al.3Hougen I. Leon S. Whitlock R. et al.Hyperkalemia and its association with mortality, cardiovascular events, hospitalizations and ICU admissions in a population-based retrospective cohort.Kidney Int Rep. 2021; 6: 1309-1316Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (8) Google Scholar have described the association between hyperkalemia and mortality, cardiovascular events, hospitalizations, and intensive care unit admissions, leveraging provincial administrative health databases in Manitoba, Canada, with both inpatient and outpatient laboratory results to identify patients with hyperkalemia and a propensity-matched cohort. Of the 93,667 patients identified to have had a hyperkalemic episode, 88,541 were propensity matched to patients without hyperkalemia by age, sex, baseline comorbidities, and the use of medications that affect serum potassium levels in a 1:1 fashion. Among hyperkalemic events, the majority were mild (5–<5.5 mmol/l) with a mean baseline serum potassium of 5.29 mmol/l. Not surprisingly, and in congruence with previous observational studies, hyperkalemia was associated with increased short-term and all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, incidence of hospitalizations, and ICU admissions. Individuals who experienced hyperkalemia in the outpatient setting, 2 or more hyperkalemic episodes, or more severe hyperkalemia (≥5.5 mmol/l) also experienced increased risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events. As a very large, well-designed, propensity-matched cohort study, the authors uniquely demonstrate a persistent association of hyperkalemia with long-term outcomes beyond 30 days and describe the association between hyperkalemia and intensive care unit admissions. Although the use of a population-based sample contributes to the generalizability and strength of the study, the authors were unable to account for several important confounders, most specifically the acute cause of the hyperkalemic event and the consequences related to the interventions used as a result of hyperkalemia (i.e., short-term management with sodium polystyrene sulfonate) or longer-term management through the discontinuation of renal and cardioprotective RAASi, all of which could confer worse outcomes. Where do we go from here? We know that hyperkalemia is associated with adverse outcomes, both in the short- and long-term clinical setting and likely contributes substantially to the health care cost burden associated with increased hospitalizations and intensive care unit admissions. In doing so, the prevention and management of hyperkalemia become convoluted and more nuanced. For example, in higher-risk patients who would benefit from the use of RAASi, where is the greater risk? Is it in stopping RAASi or in permitting low-grade hyperkalemia to enable the resumption or continued use of RAASi? In fact, this risk-benefit ratio remains poorly described and represents an area in need of further investigation. Perhaps the introduction of the newer serum potassium–lowering agents patiromer and sodium zirconium cyclosilicate will alleviate such conundrums as they are increasingly used to facilitate the resumption and continued use of RAASi. Although the newer potassium-lowering agents have yet to demonstrate mortality benefit, they have demonstrated successful reduction of hyperkalemia in a variety of higher-risk populations.4Kosiborod M. Rasmussen H. Lavin P. et al.Effect of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate on potassium lowering for 28 days among outpatients with hyperkalemia: the HARMONIZE Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA. 2014; 312: 2223-2233Crossref PubMed Scopus (244) Google Scholar, 5Bakris G. Pitt B. Weir M. et al.Effect of patiromer on serum potassium level in patients with hyperkalemia and diabetic kidney disease: the AMETHYST-DN randomized clinical trial.JAMA. 2015; 314: 151-161Crossref PubMed Scopus (283) Google Scholar, 6Anker S. Kosiborod M. Zannad F. et al.Maintenance of serum potassium with sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (ZS-9) in heart failure patients: results from a phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Eur J Heart Fail. 2015; 17: 1050-1056Crossref PubMed Scopus (116) Google Scholar, 7Kloner R. Gross C. Yuan J. Effect of patiromer in hyperkalemic patients taking and not taking RAAS inhibitors.J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2018; 23: 524-531Crossref PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar, 8Agarwal R. Rossignol P. Romero A. et al.Patiromer versus placebo to enable spironolactone use in patients with resistant hypertension and chronic kidney disease (AMBER): a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Lancet. 2019; 394: 1540-1550Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (129) Google Scholar, 9Spinowitz B. Fishbane S. Pergola P. et al.Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate among individuals with hyperkalemia.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019; 14: 798-809Crossref PubMed Scopus (80) Google Scholar As clinicians are becoming more comfortable using these newer serum potassium–lowering agents in the acute and chronic setting, future investigation is warranted to examine whether they also lower consequences such as long-term mortality, cardiovascular events, hospitalizations, and health care costs. Finally, the growing body of literature supporting low-grade hyperkalemia-associated adverse events calls into question the safety of permissive hyperkalemia with RAASi, identifying a need to better define both the thresholds at which serum potassium–lowering agents ought to be considered as well as the therapeutic goal. The author declared no competing interests. Hyperkalemia and its Association With Mortality, Cardiovascular Events, Hospitalizations, and Intensive Care Unit Admissions in a Population-Based Retrospective CohortKidney International ReportsVol. 6Issue 5PreviewHyperkalemia is a common, potentially life-threatening condition in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We studied the association between hyperkalemia and mortality, cardiovascular events, hospitalizations, and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. Full-Text PDF Open Access
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».