MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W314538751

Interview with Bill Stoneman, General Manager, Anaheim Angels. (Oral History)

2002· article· en· W314538751 sur OpenAlex
Bill Kirwin

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

venuePublié dans une revue dont le pays d'attache est le Canada.
aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueNine · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican Sports and Literature
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLeaguePower (physics)HistoryManagementEconomics
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In just the tenth game of the existence of the Montreal Expos, Bill Stoneman threw a no-hitter, defeating the Philadelphia Phillies 7--0. In 1972, he was named to the National League All-Star team and pitched a second no-hitter, defeating the Mets 7-0. From 1984 until 1999, he served in the Montreal front office. In 1999, he was hired as general manager for the Angels. BS: I never thought I would come back to baseball. I had some success as a player, but my last year and a half in the Major Leagues was awful. I had hurt my shoulder and really never recovered. The power was gone from my arm. I used to have a good fastball and a good curve ball--both were gone. It just was not a whole lot of fun going out there getting your brains beat out most of the time. Occasionally, you had enough to fool somebody, but usually I didn't. At the end of my baseball career, I was with the Angels. The general manager was Harry Dalton, and he was only thirty years old. Harry made me an offer to stay in baseball, that is, go to Triple A and see if I could go and straighten out, but I knew the power was gone and I told Harry that I appreciated the opportunity but I thought it was time to get a job outside of baseball. Because the previous year and a half was not a lot of fun, I just wanted to distance myself from the game. I had a college degree [B.S. in Business from the University of Idaho] a nd I also had a master's degree (M.Ed. from the University of Oklahoma) and decided to put it to work. After my baseball career was over, I stayed in Canada, even though I was originally from the U.S., and worked for nearly ten years for Royal Trust. Had I not gone into the business community and stayed in Canada, I would have never been back in baseball. That is the reason that John McHale, the Expos general manager, invited me back into baseball. The Expos were looking for somebody with a business background who knew a little bit about baseball. BK: you left baseball, had you thought about ever coming back? BS: No. I had not given it a thought. I was very pleased to be living in Toronto working for Royal Trust. They were renowned as one of the best trainers of management people amongst financial institutions. I was very pleased with my career path, and then a flukey thing happened. My wife and I and our kids were vacationing in Prince Edward Island. At the time I was working in Toronto. I had started off with Royal Trust in Montreal, but they transferred me to Toronto after a few years. On the way back from PEI in the summer of 1982, we drove through Montreal. My wife is a Montrealer. She is French Canadian, and she wanted to stop and see her family, and it gave me an opportunity to go out and see the Expos, who happened to be in town. I stopped by the clubhouse and spoke to Steve Rogers and Gary Carter and a few of the guys who were young guys when I was with the Expos. One of the Expos office people told me that some of the press people upstairs would like to see me--guys that I had not seen in years. I was s itting and talking with a great, great writer and a wonderful guy, Jacques Beauchamp, when John McHale walked by. He interrupted for a second and said, When you're finished, I would like to see you for a minute. I saw John McHale, he said, Have you ever thought about coming back into baseball? I kind of looked at him and said, No! I I was telling the truth--I hadn't. And he said, Well, you know, baseball has changed. Ifs just not the little bitty small business that you run out of a shoebox anymore. It's becoming bigger and bigger, and we really need someone with some business experience. I know what you have been doing and I know how well you've been doing, but there is room for you here. John and I talked off and on for over a year. I was doing fine at Royal Trust, and I liked Toronto. We were settled down there, and we had not enjoyed the disruption when we moved from Montreal to Toronto, so I was not looking forward to moving again. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,220
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,780

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,2210,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,044
Tête enseignante GPT0,198
Écart entre enseignants0,154 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle