Risk Analysis of Perioperative Injections in Arthroscopic Reconstruction of the Rotator Cuff of the Shoulder – A Systematic Review
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: The present study used a systematic review to analyse the risk of perioperative injections during arthroscopic reconstruction of the rotator cuff of the shoulder. The questions of interest were whether perioperative local injection increases the infection risk and whether the number of postoperative revisions is increased. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review of the U. S. National Library of Medicine/National Institutes of Health (PubMed) database and the Cochrane Library was performed using the PRISMA checklist. The keywords used were "shoulder" and "arthroscopy" and "injection" and "risk". In the course of the study, work that was not also primarily concerned with the reconstruction of the rotator cuff was excluded. English original articles and case series were included that contained at least some arthroscopic reconstructions of the rotator cuff. The risk of bias was determined using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The content of the articles relevant to the research questions was analysed. RESULTS: 48 hits were primarily generated. 9 articles corresponded to the inclusion criteria and were analysed. In the 6 studies with details on the injected substances, cortisone was used in 98 - 100% of the cases. The reported infection and revision rates based on insurance data were higher with injection than without. The risk of bias in the studies analysed here was rather low based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Score. The risk of infection after a cortisone injection before, during or after surgery was increased. Injection was associated with infection in up to 8% of cases with injections within two weeks of surgery. The risk of infection was increased by up to 11 times with injections within 4 weeks after the operation. Likewise, the risk of revision surgery after injection was increased, with the time intervals between injection and surgery sometimes differing between studies. DISCUSSION: Local infections and to a lesser extent revision surgery are associated with perioperative injections (with cortisone) within 3 months preoperatively and 4 weeks postoperatively. However, there were only database studies of insurance data with several studies from a few centres. Thus, no causal relationships could be proven. Currently, however, the following can be recommended using a cautious approach: The interval between injection with cortisone before surgery should be at least 2 weeks, better 3 months. No cortisone injections should be applied intraoperatively. Postoperatively, cortisone should not be injected for at least 4 weeks. If, in exceptional cases, deviations from these time limits are required, patients should be informed about an increased risk of complications.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,007 | 0,004 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».