Grandparents Upbringing in Mainland China: The Status and Prospect of Research
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract This paper prospects the future study of grandparents upbringing by analyzing and summarizing briefly its nearly ten years' situation in recent mainland China in terms of its concepts and types, causes, pros and cons as well as relevant countermeasures. Key Words: Grandparents upbringing; Grandparent caregivers; Grandchildren; Pros and cons; Countermeasures GU Jihui, WU Dingchu (2012). Grandparents Upbringing in Mainland China: The Status and Prospect of Research. Cross-Cultural Communication, 8(3), 58-64. Available from URL: http://www. cscanada.net/index.php/ccc/article/view/j.ccc. 19236700201 20803. 1160 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/j.ccc.1923670020120803.1160. Ever since 1990s, there has always been a trend of accelerated growth of grandparents breeding families in mainland China. Take Shanghai for example, the ratio of grandparents raising grandchildren was 50%60% according to a survey done by the relevant departments during Children's Day Festival in 2004 (Anonymous, 2005). Whereas on July 17th 2007, the ratio of grandparents undertaking the upbringing of infants and small children has reached over 88.9% declared by the first forum hosted by Shanghai Municipal Welfare Fund etc. on Improving the Quality of the Population-the Socialization of the Only Child's Early Education (ZHU, 2007). Therefore, grandparents upbringing has become a pattern for the mainland families in China to breed their young. As shown by the CNKI database, Li Bin is the first one who has ever engaged in the study of grandparents upbringing (LI, 1995). There are no more than 10 documents on such topics from January, 1996 to December, 2000. However, while searching all through from year 2001 to 2011 by such key words as 'grandparents upbringing', 'grandparents breeding', 'grandparents nursling' in the CNKI database, we found that number has already reached well over 345 exclusive of the another 89 documents obtained by the same methods in Wanfang Data. Yearly distribution of like literature through quantified analysis is shown respectively by the following Chart 1 and Diagram 1 respectively. As shown by the above, the number in 2004 increased rapidly and since then the annual number of literature published has gone up and down with 2010 as the year having most number of literature covering 13.36% of the total. The existing studies involve mainly topics in terms of the concepts, causes, types, advantages and disadvantages as well as countermeasures etc., most of which are researches into the advantages and disadvantages. And furthermore a lot has been described about the mutual influence done on both the grandparent caregivers and their grandchildren while less has been done in the thorough study of the influence on the part of the grandchildren separately and only in the recent two years the study of how the grandparent caregivers are affected has been noted (Shown by Chart 2). I. THE PRESENT STATUS OF RESEARCH 1. THE DEFINITIONS AND TYPES OF GRANDPARENTS UPBRINGING 1.1 The Definitions As LI (2001) put out in 2001 that grandparents upbringing is a family education pattern by which grandparents take up the responsibility in nursling and educating their grandchildren (LI, 2001). LUO and SHE (2004) held that grandparents upbringing is grandparents as surrogate parents to their grandchildren (LUO & SHE, 2004). LI (2006) pointed out that compared with parenthood education, grandparents upbringing suggests an education mode in which the very parents of the children hand over their responsibility and obligation of nursling and educating the young to their parents (LI, 2006). GU (2010) considered grandparents upbringing means a lot more than grandparents nursling owing dual meaning of both the education and breeding, which indicate that grandparent caregivers will provide their grandchildren with guaranteed materials and information for the latter development (GU, 2010). …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».