MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3149658294 · doi:10.1111/ajt.13919

Reply to “Old Habits Die Hard: Screening for and Treating Asymptomatic Bacteriuria After Kidney Transplantation”

2016· letter· en· W3149658294 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Julia Origüen, Francisco López‐Medrano, Mario Fernández‐Ruiz, José María Aguado

Notice bibliographique

RevueAmerican Journal of Transplantation · 2016
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueUrinary Tract Infections Management
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineAsymptomaticKidney transplantationTransplantationBacteriuriaImmunosuppressionUrinary systemIncidence (geometry)Internal medicineProspective cohort studyCohortEpidemiologyRegimenSurgery

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

To the Editor We appreciate the comments of Coussement et al (1Coussement J Nagler EV Abramowicz D Old habits die hard: Screening for and treating asymptomatic bacteriuria after kidney transplantation.Am J Transplant. 2006; (DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13888[Epub ahead of print])Google Scholar) about our prospective randomized study to determine the potential benefits of screening for and antimicrobial treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria (AB) in kidney transplant (KTx) recipients. Indeed, the observed incidence of acute pyelonephritis (APN) in the control group turned out to be lower than expected; therefore, we acknowledge that our study could eventually be underpowered, as already discussed in the paper. Notwithstanding this potential limitation, we would like to make some observations. Most previous studies in this field did not offer separate rates for symptomatic and asymptomatic episodes of posttransplant urinary tract infection (UTI), and the follow-up periods varied widely across studies. The figure used as incidence of APN in the control group to estimate our sample size (23%) was based on a cohort of 161 KTx recipients from a Spanish center who were followed up prospectively for 180 days (2Valera B Gentil MA Cabello V Fijo J Cordero E Cisneros JM Epidemiology of urinary infections in renal transplant recipients.Transplant Proc. 2006; 38: 2414-2415Crossref PubMed Scopus (111) Google Scholar), as we assumed that the immunosuppression regimen and the species distribution would be similar to ours. Other authors have reported roughly comparable rates (16.5–18.7%). In addition, it is likely that the expected impact for the tested intervention was too optimistic. Such estimation was based on a previous observational study from our group, in which we found a 3-year cumulative incidence of APN of 10% among KTx recipients in whom AB was systematically searched for and treated (3Fiorante S Fernández-Ruiz M López-Medrano F et al.Acute graft pyelonephritis in renal transplant recipients: Incidence, risk factors and long-term outcome.Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011; 26: 1065-1073Crossref PubMed Scopus (68) Google Scholar). Relying on the fact that our follow-up period would be shorter, that adherence to the treatment protocol for AB would be strict in the intervention group (antibiotic therapy was not given in ≈30% of episodes in the aforementioned observational study), and that APN episodes occurring within the first 2 mo after transplantation would be excluded, we estimated an absolute risk reduction of 20% between study groups, which was sensibly higher than that finally observed. Small randomized trials have prompted changes in the clinical management of AB in other populations. The trial performed by Harding et al (4Harding GK Zhanel GG Nicolle LE Cheang M Manitoba Diabetes Urinary Tract Infection Study G. Antimicrobial treatment in diabetic women with asymptomatic bacteriuria.N Engl J Med. 2002; 347: 1576-1583Crossref PubMed Scopus (194) Google Scholar) among diabetic women with AB enrolled an overall number of 105 patients (50 in the placebo group and 55 in the antimicrobial therapy group), whereas the recently published study by Kazemier et al (5Kazemier BM Koningstein FN Schneeberger C et al.Maternal and neonatal consequences of treated and untreated asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy: A prospective cohort study with an embedded randomised controlled trial.Lancet Infect Dis. 2015; 15: 1324-1333Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (127) Google Scholar) included 248 pregnant women, with 40 of them randomly assigned to treatment with nitrofurantoin and 45 with placebo. Despite its limitations, our results suggest that the potential benefit derived from systematically treating posttransplant AB in the clinical arena would be modest at best for several reasons: The strict compliance with antimicrobial treatment in each of the numerous episodes of AB occurring in some patients was extremely difficult; half of the episodes of symptomatic UTI were not preceded by AB; urine sterilization was not achieved in as many as half of the treated episodes, whereas a third of them spontaneously cleared without therapy; and the proportion of multidrug-resistant uropathogens in the KTx setting is high and increasing (6Origüen J Fernández-Ruiz M López-Medrano F et al.Progressive increase of resistance in Enterobacteriaceae urinary isolates from kidney transplant recipients over the past decade: Narrowing of the therapeutic options.Transpl Infect Dis. 2016; (doi:10.1111/tid.12547)Crossref PubMed Scopus (39) Google Scholar). We concur with Coussement et al that it will be of most interest to corroborate these findings by means of larger multicenter trials. The authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose as described by the American Journal of Transplantation.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,420
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,263
Écart entre enseignants0,251 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAmerican Journal of TransplantationMême sujetUrinary Tract Infections ManagementTravaux en français237 207