MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3149816463 · doi:10.1097/00000542-200703000-00048

Society of Neurosurgical Anesthesia and Critical Care Annual Meeting.

2007· article· en· W3149816463 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Edward C. Nemergut, Mark A. Warner

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnesthesiology · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineNeuroscience
ThématiqueAnesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineAnesthesiologyBrain functionPerioperative medicineLibrary scienceAnesthesiaPsychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia. en3x@virginia.eduSociety of Neurosurgical Anesthesia and Critical Care Annual Meeting. Chicago, Illinois. October 13, 2006The Annual Meeting of the Society of Neurosurgical Anesthesia and Critical Care (SNACC) was held at the Hilton Chicago (Chicago, Illinois) on Friday, October 13, 2006. Sulpicio G. Soriano, M.D. (Associate Professor of Anesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, Massachusetts), organized the program, which included lectures on brain function monitoring, leukocyte trafficking and neuroinflammation, pediatric traumatic brain injury, and anesthetic-induced neurodegradation. Two hundred eighty-six SNACC members attended the meeting this year. The SNACC continues to have a strong international presence with attendees from the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Germany, Japan, The Netherlands, Italy, Belgium, South Korea, India, Denmark, Portugal, Australia, Israel, Sweden, and Switzerland.The evening before the meeting, a dinner symposium titled “Brain Function Monitoring” was moderated by Cornelis J. Kalkman, M.D., Ph.D. (Professor, Department of Perioperative Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Treatment, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands). The symposium was supported by an unrestricted educational grant from Aspect Medical Systems (Newton, Massachusetts) and Hospira, Inc. (North Billerica, Massachusetts). Ira Rampil, M.D. (Professor of Anesthesiology and Neurologic Surgery, SUNY Stony Brook Medical Center, New York, New York), discussed the basic technology behind brain function monitoring, including electrode placement, signal amplification, filtering, and analog-to-digital conversion. He also delineated the differences of digital signal processing and computation between different commercially available monitors. Michael Struys, M.D., Ph.D. (Professor of Anesthesiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium), then discussed brain function monitors and anesthetic pharmacology. He reviewed the relation between drug serum concentration, drug effect site concentration, and clinical and electroencephalographically measured depth of anesthesia. Finally, Paul Myles, M.D. (Professor and Director of Anesthesia, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia), discussed the results of several large multicenter trials using brain function monitoring and discussed the ability of brain function monitors to prevent awareness during anesthesia and improve patient outcome. One hundred eighty-five members of the society attended the dinner symposium.Richard M. Ransohoff, M.D. (Director Neuroinflammation Research Center, Department of Neurosciences, Lerner Research Institute/Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio), delivered a lecture on “Leukocyte Trafficking in the CNS.” He introduced the topic of neuroinflammation by presenting data to suggest that there are three distinct routes for leukocyte entry into the central nervous system: from blood to cerebrospinal fluid across the choroid plexus, from blood to the subarachnoid space through meningeal vessels, and from blood to parenchymal perivascular spaces. He outlined the function of chemokines, chemokine receptors, and their role in the recruitment of hematogenous leukocytes into the central nervous system. He indicated that, because of their central role in this process, chemokines and their receptors are some of the most tractable drug targets in the regulation of inflammation. He ended his talk with a discussion of natalizumab, a monoclonal antibody to α4-integrin that was approved for the treatment of multiple sclerosis and the first drug to target leukocyte transmigration. Natalizumab is believed to function by reducing the migration of activated T lymphocytes into the central nervous system; however, its use has been associated with a rare complication, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. The impressive efficacy and appearance of this adverse effect underlines both the promise and the challenges involved in the modification of leukocyte transport for the treatment of inflammatory diseases.After Dr. Ransohoff's lecture, the morning poster session commenced. Twenty-four moderators facilitated the presentation of 128 posters in 12 areas of neuroanesthesia and neuroscience.The morning concluded with a mini-symposium on pediatric traumatic brain injury that was moderated by Monica S. Vavilala, M.D. (Associate Professor, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington). The first speaker was Patrick M. Kochanek, M.D. (Director, Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania), who gave an exciting talk titled “Critical Mechanisms of Damage and Repair in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: From Blood Pressure to Proteomics.” Dr. Kochanek discussed the response of the pediatric brain to injury and the evolution and control of secondary injury, highlighting the differences between the adult and the pediatric brain. The second speaker was P. David Adelson, M.D. (Professor of Neurological Surgery, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh), who gave a thought provoking talk titled “Contemporary and Novel Treatment of Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury.” Dr. Adelson discussed both surgical and nonsurgical means to reduce secondary injury after traumatic brain injury, with a focus on the aggressive reduction of increased intracranial pressure. He also highlighted differences between adult and pediatric traumatic brain injury, including the increased incidence among children of diffuse cerebral swelling with its associated mortality.During the business luncheon, the 2006 Distinguished Teacher Award was presented to John Drummond, M.D. (Professor and Chairman, Department of Anesthesiology, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, California). There were numerous accolades from several of Dr. Drummond's trainees at various institutions that attested to the positive impact Dr. Drummond has had, and continues to have, on their careers.The 2006 John B. Michenfelder, M.D., SNACC New Investigator Award was presented by Rona G. Gifford, M.D., Ph.D. (Professor, Department of Anesthesia, Stanford University, Stanford, California), to Ines P. Koerner, M.D., Ph.D. (Fellow in Critical Care, Department of Anesthesiology and Peri-Operative Medicine, University of Oregon, Portland, Oregon). Dr. Koerner gave a short lecture on her research titled “Polymorphisms in Human Soluble Epoxide Hydrolase Gene (EPHX2 ) Linked to Neuronal Survival after Ischemic Injury.” She used site-directed mutagenesis to create EPHX2 mutants and then studied the impact of theses mutations on soluble epoxide hydrolase activity and the susceptibility to ischemic injury. She found that these variations in the EPHX2 gene impacted the susceptibility to ischemic injury and neuronal survival, and these changes were based on changes in the enzyme's hydrolase activity. Dr. Koerner and 10 other resident–investigators received travel awards for the Integra Foundation.William Slikker, Jr., Ph.D. (Director, National Center for Toxicological Research/Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, Arkansas), delivered a fascinating talk on the controversial topic of “Anesthetic-induced Neurodegeneration during Development.” Dr. Slikker began by reviewing some of the data suggesting that general anesthetics trigger widespread apoptotic neurodegradation in the immature rats. The relevance of neurotoxicity observed in 7-day-old rat pups to infants and children is unknown; however, it could have broad implications. Given the importance of this issue and the need for a primate model, Dr. Slikker presented fascinating in vivo data regarding the effects of ketamine on infant monkeys. Infant monkeys were evaluated after 3 h and 24 h of intravenous ketamine anesthesia. The 24-h exposure was selected as a longer duration, whereas a 3-h exposure was selected because it closely represents clinical general anesthesia. The 24-h ketamine infusion was associated with evidence of apoptosis and necrosis in infant monkeys. In addition, Dr. Slikker explained that the monkey brain, like the rat brain, seems particularly sensitive during the early development stages. Finally, he presented data to suggest that short-term (3-h) ketamine exposure did not produce cell death in the perinatal primate.The afternoon concluded with the Clinical Forum, which consisted of two case discussions lead by Basil Matta, M.B., F.R.C.A. (Clinical Director, Cambridge University Foundation, Trust Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom), and Arthur M. Lam, M.D. (Professor, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center). The format for these discussions included real-time audience polling, which served to make the session more interactive and inspired many lively discussions. The first case involved a pediatric victim of a motor vehicle crash with a significant traumatic brain injury. Issues generating the most discussion included pharmacologic treatment for increased intracranial pressure, fluid management, and the timing of a decompressive craniectomy. The second case discussed involved a patient with a subarachnoid hemorrhage. The issues of appropriate surgical management were debated, and an exciting discussion regarding the options for intraoperative neuromonitoring ensued.The society will reconvene at the 2007 annual meeting on October 12, 2007, in San Francisco, California.University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia. en3x@virginia.edu

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,027
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,727

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,037
Tête enseignante GPT0,328
Écart entre enseignants0,291 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAnesthesiologyMême sujetAnesthesia and Neurotoxicity ResearchTravaux en français237 207