MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3152167417

Genetic and phenotypic analysis of elbow dysplasia in four large Swedish dog breeds

2020· article· en· W3152167417 sur OpenAlex
Anna Medved

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueEpsilon Archive for Student Projects (University of Southampton) · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineVeterinary
ThématiqueVeterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineBreedLamenessClubElbowPopulationDemographyEpidemiologyPediatricsFamily medicineSurgeryEnvironmental healthInternal medicine
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Elbow dysplasia (ED) is a common hereditary disease in dogs. Elbow dysplasia develops during the critical growth period between 4-12 months of age in large breed dogs and causes pain and lameness in the front limbs. In worst case it can lead to euthanasia. Therefore, a control programme (implemented different years for different breeds) through the Swedish Kennel Club is applied for ED to improve the health of affected breeds. However, few studies have investigated the association between screening results and clinical symptoms. The aim of this thesis was therefore to investigate if the screening results are well associated with the clinical symptoms. Furthermore, this thesis will investigate how many individuals with severe clinical symptoms that do not undergo the official screening in the control programme at the age of 12 months or older.
\nFour breeds with high prevalence of ED were included in the study; Rottweilers, German Shepherd dogs, Labrador retrievers and Golden retrievers. Data from the official ED screening programme from the Swedish Kennel Club (SKK) database, as well as data from elbow related insurance claims from the insurance company Agria. Approximately 54 000 dogs had an official screening results, and 574 observations also had insurance claims for elbow related issues.
\nResults showed that most of the dogs with an insurance claim were younger than the official screening age of 12 months. It was also shown that dogs with insurance claims generally had higher scores for ED compared with the general screened population. However, there was a high proportion of dogs with a normal screening result (ED score = 0) that still had an insurance claim, which was unexpected. The heritability for ED was between 0.13-0.20. Males, compared to females, had higher regression coefficients for inbreeding coefficient, weight at screening and age at screening related to ED.
\nThe conclusions are that the screening results seem to be a valuable indication of later ED-related clinical issues. However, a larger proportion of dogs than expected with an insurance claim had an official screening score of 0 (normal). The diagnosis fragmented coronoid process (FCP) had highest frequency in those dogs. Perhaps a second projection in the screening program could be beneficial in finding these cases. Also, the current routine control used today could perhaps be improved by including regressions nested within sex, litter effect and panellist.
\nThe results from this thesis should be interpreted carefully since the number of observations were few. Also, there was no guarantee that animals not included in the merged data were healthy since they could have been insured in another insurance company. However, Agria has the largest market share among all the insurance companies for pets. Moreover, more research is needed with a more complete data to validate the results from this thesis.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,039
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,935

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,048
Tête enseignante GPT0,287
Écart entre enseignants0,239 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle