MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W3154495837 · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100833

Denied the right to comfort: Racial inequities in palliative care provision

2021· article· en· W3154495837 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Kavita Algu

Notice bibliographique

RevueEClinicalMedicine · 2021
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Établissements canadiensMount Sinai Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicinePalliative careHealth careOppressionDehumanizationHuman rightsNursingLawCriminologySociologyPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

People who are racialized often exist in the margins of our health systems. Inequitable health care is experienced from the moment of birth and continues throughout life, extending into end of life and palliative care. This occurs even though the United Nations acknowledges palliative care as a human right [[1]Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Economic and Social Council. Sect. general comment no. 14: the rigth to the highest attainable standard of health. [Internet]. 2000 Aug 11 [cited 2021 March 8]. Available from: https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/4538838d0.pdfGoogle Scholar], and the World Health Organization (WHO) mandates that all states provide it [[2]World Health Organization. Paliative care. [Internet]. 2020 August 5[cited 2021 March 8]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/palliative-careGoogle Scholar]. As we strive for health systems where all people are treated equitably, palliative care must be included. To begin, it is important to collate what is known, and then to chart a way forward. This piece will focus on palliative care in the US and Canada but similar concepts may apply more broadly. It is known that race is a subjective, social construct—with no genetic basis— initially created to facilitate dehumanization and abuse of those living outside of Europe starting in the 1500s. The effects of colonialism are still felt in many realms. For example, a false belief that people who are Black feel less pain was created as a tool of oppression and slavery. Its legacy continues, and Black adults and children still endure inadequate treatment of their pain [[3]Hoffman K.M. Trawalter S. Axt J.R. Oliver M.N. Racial bias in pain assessment and treatment recommendations, and false beliefs about biological differences between blacks and whites.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016; 113: 4296-4301Crossref PubMed Scopus (569) Google Scholar,[4]Goyal M.K. Kuppermann N. Cleary S.D. Teach S.J. Chamberlain J.M. Racial disparities in pain management of children with appendicitis in emergency departments.JAMA Pediatr. 2015; 169: 996-1002Crossref PubMed Scopus (187) Google Scholar]. Later, in Canada, the reserve system was devised to assist with committing cultural genocide against Indigenous peoples. Today, those living on reserves have inadequate access to many medical necessities [[5]Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern AffairsThe challenges of delivering continuing care in first nation communities. House of Commons, Canada2018Google Scholar], including several WHO essential medications for symptom management; violating the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. When navigating our end of life journeys, most individuals would benefit from receiving culturally safe palliative care. In a landmark study by Temel et al., patients with advanced lung cancer who received early palliative care had statistically significant improvements in their quality of life, mood, and lived 30% longer [[6]Temel J.S. Greer J.A. Muzikansky A. Gallagher E.R. Admane S. Jackson V.A. et al.Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.N Engl J Med. 2010; 363: 733-742Crossref PubMed Scopus (4560) Google Scholar]. However, the benefits of palliative care are not experienced equitably. Many racialized people have suffered discrimination at the hands of the health system and are affected by intergenerational racial trauma. Racialized individuals have less utilization of palliative care services, experience worse symptom control, and are less likely to have their end of life wishes documented or respected [[7]Crawley L.M. Racial, cultural, and ethnic factors influencing end-of-life care.J Palliat Med. 2005; 8: S58-S69Crossref PubMed Google Scholar]. If one's preferred language is not the most commonly spoken language, professional interpretation is frequently denied, resulting in inadequate communication and poorer symptom management [[8]Silva M.D. Genoff M. Zaballa A. Jewell S. Stabler S. Gany F.M. et al.Interpreting at the end of life: a systematic review of the impact of interpreters on the delivery of palliative care services to cancer patients with limited English proficiency.J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016; 51: 569-580Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (64) Google Scholar]. Racism manifests in multiple forms. On the individual level, health care providers bring assumptions about race, ethnicity and culture which may have immense impacts on the care received [[6]Temel J.S. Greer J.A. Muzikansky A. Gallagher E.R. Admane S. Jackson V.A. et al.Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.N Engl J Med. 2010; 363: 733-742Crossref PubMed Scopus (4560) Google Scholar]. These prejudices are frequently unconscious and unrecognized. Furthermore, within the health care workforce many racialized groups remain under-represented, despite mounting evidence of the benefits of racial inclusion. For example, a recent study showed that the mortality of Black newborns was halved if their doctor was also Black [[9]Greenwood B.N. Hardeman R.R. Huang L. Sojourner A. Physician-patient racial concordance and disparities in birthing mortality for newborns.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020; 117: 21194-21200Crossref PubMed Scopus (119) Google Scholar]. Medical research can further exacerbate health inequities for racialized people, with many disparities being attributed erroneously to other factors, ignoring the predominant cause: systemic racism [[10]Bailey Z.D. Feldman J.M. Bassett M.T. How structural racism works - racist policies as a root cause of US racial health inequities.N Engl J Med. 2021; 384: 768-773Crossref PubMed Scopus (134) Google Scholar]. Furthermore, racialized participants are underrepresented in most palliative care studies and there is limited research examining racial inequalities. Palliative care for racialized people is in a state of crisis, and urgent action is needed. Looking forward, we must:(1)Acknowledge systemic racism and its effects: Everyone working within the palliative care system must receive education on colonialism, cultural safety and anti-racism; and must advocate for anti-racist policies in all areas where we have influence.(2)Make palliative care systems racially representative of the people served: Initiatives to recruit under-represented groups into the health professions, into program staffing, and into leadership positions must be supported.(3)Collect race-based data and tie it to meaningful action: Utilization or outcome differences based on race should be recognized as health disparities and remediated. Cultural safety must be ensured, and community stakeholders must be engaged at all steps.(4)Prioritize representation in palliative research: Racialized participants must be included in studies. Research that is funded and published must represent work produced from racially diverse investigators and increased racial representation is needed within the publishing industry, including on editorial boards. Palliative care in many countries has its roots in policies, beliefs and practices that were determined by its almost unanimously White founders. It is time to critically examine palliative care provision through a lens grounded in anti-racism and the protection of human rights. We, as a palliative care community, must move from a system of exclusion and marginalization to one of inclusion and empowerment. We must use our collective power to build up a society where all individuals can receive high quality palliative care that acknowledges their individual worth and dignity. The time for action is now. The author has no conflicts of interests or disclosures to report. Thank you to Thandi Briggs, Joshua Wales, Maxxine Rattner, Dallas Duncan, Joanna Law and Linda Rhodenizer for reviewing earlier drafts, providing feedback, and their continued support.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,504
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,455

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,154
Tête enseignante GPT0,487
Écart entre enseignants0,334 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations35
Publié2021
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEClinicalMedicineMême sujetPalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesTravaux en français237 207